It seemed more than a bit odd to more than a few people that the White House tonight is holding a dinner honoring visiting Pope Benedict XVI, but the pope isn't scheduled to be at the dinner.
The official word is a bit confusing.
White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said on Saturday he didn't know why the pope was not on the guest list.
Yesterday the official word was that the pope would be attending a prayer service with U.S. bishops at around the time of tonight's state dinner.
Some blogs made it out to be a papal snub of the White House or an example of incompetence at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. to schedule.
The pope was also expected to be a no-show tonight at his 81st birthday party that some people thought was being thrown for him by opera star Placido Domingo at the Italian Embassy.
Another snub?
"I was a bit surprised at first when I heard about the White House dinner," said Michael Novak, a Catholic and a scholar in religion, philosophy and politics at the American Enterprise Institute.
Mr. Novak told The Washington Times the whole dinner thing was scheduled with the Vatican some time ago.
He said a Vatican and a White House official each told him the pope never said he was going to attend the White House dinner.
"It was coordinated with the Holy See," said Mr. Novak, who said he talked with the Vatican embassy and the White House.
Mr. Novak was invited and planned to attend the White House dinner for the pope tonight.
"There's going to be Catholic leaders in town from all over the country for the pope's visit, and by and large these people have been very strong supporters of President Bush's," Mr. Novak said.
"It was too good a political opportunity to miss," he said. "That's the only way I can dope this out."
He said he couldn't remember the last time any pope attended a state dinner.
UPDATE: The latest White House briefing didn't add much in the way of clarity of explanation:
From the briefing:
Q: There hasn't seemed to be, from the podium there, a lot of talk about this being a state visit. But it is a state visit.
Question from a reporter: And do you know of any other state visit in which the guest of honor did not attend the dinner, the state dinner?
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino: No, I do not know that. But you understand the — what we have said is that we knew we wanted to give this dinner. The Pope had a schedule that he was already planning to have, and the President said that he would like to have the Catholic leaders that came to Washington, D.C., to come to the arrival ceremony today, amongst others, here at the dinner, and they're very happy to have this event tonight.
— Ralph Z. Hallow, national political reporter, The Washington Times
Comments (12)
huh ?
Posted by tps | April 16, 2008 6:11 PM
But I bet you the Pope plans to be there in spirit!
Posted by amorrison | April 16, 2008 6:12 PM
And this state dinner that the Pope most likely will NOT attend is going to cost the American tax payers how much?!
Posted by ELLEN | April 16, 2008 6:13 PM
More of our hard-earned tax dollars being frittered away by the administration.
Posted by grr | April 16, 2008 6:16 PM
Like they say on Seinfeld, "it's a whole lot about nothing" or "it's something about nothing" or "it's nothing about something." How awkward or maybe it's not awkward. How wierd or maybe it's not wierd. Forgetfulness is in order that way no one will think anything about nothing awkard about this wierd thing.
Posted by MissClarity | April 16, 2008 6:23 PM
Doesn't seem like it would be difficult to track the whereabouts of the leader of the Catholic church...
or am I missing something?
Where are the paparazzi when you need them! :-)
Posted by David... | April 16, 2008 6:23 PM
just another example of foreners hating America. Who needs this papacy stuff anyway - its the 21s century after all. Git with the program.
Posted by Mark | April 16, 2008 6:25 PM
"There's going to be Catholic leaders in town from all over the country for the pope's visit, and by and large these people have been very strong supporters of President Bush's," Mr. Novak said.
Well, Bush/Cheney are taking this cost-free for the Republican Party opportunity to thank their supporters and contributors. None of them care where the Pope is - Pope doesn't pay them anything, but his name has value for publicity and attracting Catholic votes and money.
Posted by NortCarolinian | April 16, 2008 6:34 PM
Hey Washington times/firshwrap did you go home for the night? sweet dreams til sunbeams find you
Posted by Anonymous | April 16, 2008 6:37 PM
Hey everybody, you need to turn your clocks back 1500 years ago to the time of the Dark Ages. They are upon us.
Posted by Dilberth | April 16, 2008 6:52 PM
The Pope is a pious man. His is not a political visit nor one to socialize. Rather one of a pilgrimage. I'm certain that his preference would be to share time with the cardinals and the US HolySee.
Posted by E | April 16, 2008 7:57 PM
Please, please.
It is very simple. The Pope does not eat in public. Never. Ever.
The White House was advised of this, can't imagine why it would not be truthful about this.
Posted by patty | April 18, 2008 10:48 AM