body bg wrapper bg wrapper bg home news opinion sections classifieds affiliates
advertisement

« Video: Fred or Tammy? | Main | 'Sudden Jihad Syndrome' »

Video: Hillary's final Iowa ad


A soft, smiling Hillary Rodham Clinton says: "We finally have an opportunity for a new beginning."



Via Hot Air, where Allahpundit says:

Jobs, health care, government reform, alternative energy, Iraq: Never has so much been promised to so many while saying so little.
It's the standard-issue Team Hillary message, but that doesn't mean it's not effective. Meanwhile, Ace of Spades and Dan Riehl both say they'd vote for Hillary over Mike Huckabee. (Hat tip: Pursuing Holiness.)

-- Robert Stacy McCain, assistant national editor, The Washington Times

Comments (3)

More blame politics. It's all Bush's fault. We are in an era of instant exploitation of vulnerabilities. We cannot have the past consensus without compliance model run our policies. The previous Clinton model provided only legal excuses for not taking action after Somalia, the WTC bombing, the Khobar Towers bombing, the Embassy bombings and the USS Cole bombings. The world realizes this and the anti-Americanism created in the past seven years indicates that we are getting our comeuppance for being on top. If the past is any indicator, Clinton will NOT rebuild our military after they return from Iraq, instead, support funding for training and rebuilding will be transitioned to operational funding. This is a high risk environment for the future and not necessarily the best for our nation.

When are Hillary Clinton, the other politicians and global liberals going to quit denegrating the term "cowboy"? The cowboy is a determinant part of our history and led the way to westward expansion after the civil war. Their degrogatory uses are taken totally out the context of time and used against anyone from the west in denegrating rhetoric. It's use is becoming a sickening political adjective to indicate anything that does not fit today's social intellect. After 7 years of a do nothing Congress, it would behoove the bozo's that use the term in such a manner to review some of the accomplishments of the "cowboy" of the past.

A Clinton victory would be a disaster for this nation, both economically and militarily. It would be disastrous economically because she would raise taxes dramatically just to pay for her endless social welfare programs, whether we needed them or not. It would be a disaster militarily because she would also gut the military just like her husband did in the 1990s, even though we now need an even bigger armed forces in order to deal with the war on terror. I really don't think the American public could be so naive as to actually vote for a hypocrite and panderer like Clinton.

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated.)

The 

Washington Times Advertising Links


 

The Washington Times - Brighter. Bolder. Privacy Policy | About TWT | Site Map | Contact Us
Advertise | Subscription Services
All site contents copyright © The Washington Times, LLC.

home news opinion sections classifieds affiliates