body bg wrapper bg wrapper bg home news opinion sections classifieds affiliates
advertisement

« GWU student fakes hate | Main | Questions about Pakistan »

White House: Musharraf on the clock


The White House said this morning that they want a promise to hold free elections straight from the mouth of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf.


"We'd like to see a statement come out by Musharraf, or something explicit by him," said White House press secretary Dana Perino.


Pakistan's Attorney General General Malik Abdul Qayyum yesterday said that "elections will be held within the next 60 days."


Middle East expert Anthony H. Cordesman said yesterday that such promises probably don't mean much, even if they come from Mr. Musharraf himself, because of the way that the military general seized total control of his country.


Mr. Musharraf said he was announcing a state of emergency to protect against Islamic militants, but his actions have indicated he feared an action by the nation's supreme court that would have stripped him of his presidency.


In the last few days Pakistani forces have arrested judges, lawyers and other activists who oppose Musharraf on political grounds.


"This really seems to be an increasingly unpopular president and military leader grasping for power," Mr. Cordesman said. "This smacks far too much of a personal power coup, and far too little of a concern with democracy or terrorism."


— Jon Ward, White House correspondent, The Washington Times

Comments (1)

When the Bush Administration begins describing the actions of other nations' leadership as having "too little of a concern with democracy or terrorism", one must wonder if they have finally lost their tremulous hold on reality. Pakistan, one must remember, was the first nation in the middle east to acquire nuclear weapons. This, coupled with Pakistan's border with a Talibani-dominated Afghanistan makes them a much-needed ally and Gen. Musharraf has been that and more. His deployment of the Rangers throughout the country, and the establishment of defense bases has helped to keep order. I felt safer in the streets of Karachi this past year than I would feel in many U.S. cities. The Pakistani's I speak with regularly are glad for the general's actions - they understand that a government led by weak bureaucrats (Ms. Bhutto included) would be an open door for Islamic extremists who have been successful in another western ally - Turkey further toward a Taliban-like government. A Pakistan in the hands of the Taliban or forces sympathetic to Al-Qaeda would be devastating to the entire world and cannot be allowed. Iran may be attempting to develop weapons of mass destruction - Pakistan has them and they work. President Bush should remember that "too little" emphasis on terrorism might include having national borders which are unsecure and stand behind our ally Pakistan in their time of need and crisis.

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated.)

The 

Washington Times Advertising Links


 

The Washington Times - Brighter. Bolder. Privacy Policy | About TWT | Site Map | Contact Us
Advertise | Subscription Services
All site contents copyright © The Washington Times, LLC.

home news opinion sections classifieds affiliates