Bryan Preston calls this "Exhibit A in the case against Hillary Clinton for president":
Joe Curl reported Oct. 20 on New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's plan to give licenses to illegals.
Rush Limbaugh complained Tuesday:
What is amazing to me about this is how Mrs. Clinton gets to be quiet when she wants to be quiet. This is her state. The fact that she's a presidential candidate only adds to the fact she should be asked about this.At Ace of Spades HQ, Jack M. calls this "the most important two minutes of the Democratic debate":
Hillary Clinton, blew it. Big Time. . . .-- Robert Stacy McCain, assistant national editor, The Washington TimesSomewhere Bill Clinton must be "feeling her pain."
Which makes me smile.
Almost as much as all the fact that she voluntarily made our best issue the topic of the news cycle for the next couple of weeks.
Comments (13)
I think Hillary Clinton is a Fake. She is really a socialist/Facist. Her only main interest is to socialize America. She really does not believe in the real Idealology of America and to make it strong.
Posted by Genece Kom | October 31, 2007 9:31 AM
Let's just admit it. Hillary is not qualified to run for the office of President. She is overreaching. She is all over the place in any issue. Who and what she is is carefully camouflaged because she is desperate to win. The real Hillary is a nightmare.
Woe unto us if she gets back to the WH.
Posted by Tuesday | October 31, 2007 11:00 AM
Resume
Name: Hillary Clinton
Objective: To be president of the United States
Education: BA, Wellesley College; law degree, Yale
Work Experience: 2001-present, U.S. Senate
pre 2000, Bill's wife
Posted by carol hellman | October 31, 2007 11:46 AM
Can anybody explain, If she can see that what Bush has done in not enforcing immigration laws has created a problem, why she is on the same side of this issue as Bush in not demanding immigration laws be enforced?
Posted by Wayne | October 31, 2007 1:55 PM
A law degree from Yale. About 100,000 other thousand other people have gotten the same degree. Do they all have the CHARACTER AND JUDGEMENT to be president of the United States? No! Hillary RODHAM Clinton does not have what it takes to make serious decisions about urgent issues. Can anyone really want someone like her to deal with serious foreign policy? I would like to see the resume of someone else.
Posted by bill helein | October 31, 2007 2:09 PM
Triangulation has inherent delays. There are certain issues that demand immediate responses, not political power brokering. Immigration is one such issue. Either supports the governor's action or she doesn't. This is like supporting the troops but not the war. It creates uncertainty and paralyzing stress. It was obvious during the Lazio debates, it is obvious now. It is her pattern and if she does it now, she will do it as president. Bottom line, can we afford the risk.
Posted by Larry Stone | October 31, 2007 3:58 PM
I join with those expressing great concern about this person (Mrs. Clinton)leading our nation and expecially our armed forces. During her "tour" in the White House, it was stated that she would not permit Marine's to wear their uniforms in the White House. Now, as a Marine Corps veteren of Vietnam, I take GREAT exception to this act of disrespect. Further, this person is a shrill and nasty human being and a closet socialist more interested in intruding on our private lives and the lives of business' in the USA. Note her comments about "taking" billions from various industries. Last I checked, only the congress can tax and she, if president, would be in the administration. Is she planning a being a dictator?
Posted by tla356 | October 31, 2007 5:05 PM
If Hillary Clinton's nose grew every time she told a lie, it would be about two feet long by now. If Obama keeps hitting her this way and confronting her with tough questions, he may just be able to win in either Iowa or New Hampshire. Everybody just assumes Clinton will get the nomination and not a single vote has been cast yet. Just remember, Howard Dean was considered to be a sure thing in 2004 and look what happened to him. Who knows, maybe Obama can beat Clinton at her own game? And if he does, the Republicans will have a field day with him.
Posted by Libertyship46 | November 1, 2007 5:13 PM
Hillary is a Clinton. Lying is as natural as having sex with White House Pages, as far as Clintons are concerned. She wants to portray herself as moderate or centrist, to get those votes. She wants to portray herself as Liberal, to get those votes. She wants to portray herself as pro-gay, to get those votes. And Pro-Family to get those votes. Pro-war to get those votes, and anti-war, to get those votes. This hypocrite will promise anything to anyone to get 8 years in the White House, under her OWN name, and NOT Bill's, so she can untether herself from the embarrassing asshole who made her look stupid way too many times. We looked the other way when Bill denied having sex "With that woman". And we looked the other way, when we found out about the dress. We looked the other way for Whitewater, and we looked the other way, when he rented out presidential rooms in the White House. But Hillary is NOT Bill. We hate her, because guys who lie, are tolerated, while females who try to get away with the same crap, are burned at the stake. As it SHOULD be.
Posted by Oscar | November 1, 2007 9:06 PM
I AM TOTALLY STUNNED THAT THIS SHRILL SOCIOPATH WHO HAS NEVER HAD ANY EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE, NO SRIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS AS A SENATOR AND IS A KNOWN LIAR, DECEIVER AND HYPOCRITE IS THE DEMOCRATIC FRONT RUNNER. IF HER NAME WAS NOT CLINTON, SHE WOULDN'T BE EVEN ABOVE 10% IN THE POLLS. I DISAGREE STRONGLY WITH EDWARDS, OBAMA AND THE OTHER DEMS RUNNING, BUT GIVE THEM CREDIT FOR HAVING THE GUTS TO STATE THEIR VIEWS AND OPINIONS AND GIVE STRAIGHT ANSWERS. GOD HELP THIS COUNTRY IF SHE IS ELECTED, BUT ON THE OTHER HAND, IF SHE IS, PERHAPS AMERICA DESERVES HER AS IT RAPIDLY STARTS TO DECLINE LIKE THE ROMAN EMPIRE.
Posted by MARC DURSO | November 2, 2007 12:22 AM
I am amazed that the whole HILLARY ! for President thing has gotten this far. Anyone considering voting for this "candidate" needs to answer this question, honestly. Would you be voting for Hillary Rodham, Junior Senator from N.Y. with no legislation solely authored by her and passed into law, no real political accomplishments to run on other than having been first lady to a President you liked ? What if she were never married to Bill Clinton ? What exactly has she done to warrant consideration for the highest office in the land ? Also, it is reasonable to assume she would not be Junior Senator from N.Y. or anywhere, without his backing. Still getting your vote ? There is a good reason she no longer insists on being referred to as Hillary Rodham. TL
Posted by Tony Linder | November 2, 2007 6:04 PM
It seems the chickens have come home to roost. We the sheeple looked the other way at the horrid behavior of those '60s/70's hippies and degenerates and they are in power and seeking more. Every society has the government it deserves.
Posted by glenn cicero | November 4, 2007 8:02 AM
If we can dispense with the inflamatory rhetoric for a minute, Senator Clinton appears to be out of touch with what the overwhelming majority of "citizens" of this country demand and desire. She represents a minority of peopole in the this county who feel that: American citizens have no right to select who will and will not gain access to our country and its copious taxpayer supported services; she fails under comprehend that every program and or service must be paid for by said citizens, that the world is a dangerous place (at times) and we as a people need certain protections including but not limited to the judicious use of military force. We the people must know what our elected officials stand for on issues of importance however the senator (and she is not alone on this one) is unable or unwilling to share with us exactly how she feels on any of these subjects and how exactly she would implement the many social and international policies that she exposes.
I am not against voting for Senator Clinton because she is a woman, from New York, (you fill in the blank), I will not vote for her because she seems to be a person with out a clear understanding of reality, reality as it pertains to fiscal responsibility, reality as to how her policies would negatively impact all of the citizens of this country, reality as to how she would implement her policies, but most of all she seems to believe that she is running for President of the world, and not the President of the United States of America.
Posted by WILLIAM JOHNSON | November 5, 2007 9:42 AM