Democratic fundraiser Norman Hsu is a fugitive after failing to show for a court hearing Wednesday:
Hsu, whose criminal past has roiled the campaigns of top presidential candidates, was scheduled to ask a judge to cut in half the $2 million bail he posted last week when he turned himself in after spending 15 years on the lam from a felony theft conviction.Fugitive felon fundraiser? Sounds kind of like Marc Rich. (Don Surber has the same idea.) Jammie Wearing Fool says, "I'm sure he'll turn up at a fundraiser soon." Ed Morrisey is outraged:Instead, San Mateo Superior Court Judge Robert Foiles ordered Hsu's bail forfeited to the county and issued a new arrest warrant. If Hsu is arrested again, he will be jailed without bail this time.
Hsu, a Hong Kong native, was also supposed to turn over his passport Wednesday. Hsu's prominent Silicon Valley criminal defense attorney Jim Brosnahan said Hsu failed to give the passport to the legal team on Monday.
"Mr. Hsu is not here and we do not know where Mr. Hsu is," Brosnahan said outside court. ...
Hsu pleaded no contest in 1991 to a felony count of grand theft, admitting he'd defrauded investors of $1 million. ... He was facing up to three years in prison when he skipped town before his 1992 sentencing date.
After pleading guilty to fraud in 1991, Hsu jumped bail rather than appear at his sentencing hearing for his agreed-upon three-year stretch. Fifteen years later, the long arm of the law finally caught up with Hsu after funneling over $1.5 million to Democrats around the country.Bill Gertz has noted the echoes of the '96 Chinagate scandal. Michelle Malkin is taking no prisoners:So what did the California court do? Let him out on bail again -- and Hsu has apparently skipped again, to no one's surprise but the moron who granted bail in the first place.
"It would be wholly inappropriate to link this in any way to the '96 campaign cycle investigations, just because both involve Asian-Americans," Lawrence Barcella, a lawyer for Hsu, who is a top donor to Hillary Clinton and other Democrats, told Politico.com.More blog reaction at Memeorandum. Expect further updates ...No. It's because both involve the craven Clintons, a trademark incuriosity about the backgrounds of big donors and a network of generous contributors of notably meager means.
-- Robert Stacy McCain, assistant national editor, The Washington Times
UPDATE:
At the American Spectator, Philip Klein finds that Hsu's corporate records don't "hold up to closer scrutiny."
And the latest Associated Press update says:
On Wednesday, Rhode Island Rep. Patrick Kennedy, who initially said he would keep the $6,200 from Hsu, announced that he would give the money to charity.-- RSM
UPDATE 6 p.m.: Suitably Flip provides a chart comparing Hsu to Jack Abramoff -- hat-tip to Blue Crab Boulevard, who notices that left-leaning bloggers seem strangely uninterested in the disappearing donor. -- RSM
Comments (6)
Ask Bill Clinton. He knows where he is. In his house in Chappaqua.
Posted by norman mailer | September 5, 2007 8:07 PM
The question here is how many 'I didn't knows' does it take to define "is".
Posted by Larry Stone | September 6, 2007 12:47 AM
Go out and ask a 1,000 people on the streets of America who Norman Hsu is. Almost all will respond with "Who?" and the vast majority won't give a rat's p'tootie who he is.
But for a different response, ask them who Senator Larry Craig, the Idaho Toe-tapper is.
Posted by George W. Kotfresser | September 6, 2007 11:07 AM
If Clinton has "trademark" lack of curiosity for a donor, what do you say about Giuliani and his coke dealing campaign manager? Or how about the GOP fundraiser, Alan Fabian, arrested just now on 23 counts including fraud. Or Bob Allen and his solicitation arrest? Or Sen. Murkowski having to give back property she got from a lobbyist.
Posted by Matt S | September 6, 2007 2:20 PM
Has he been added to the " Clinton Dead List " yet. Did he kill himself in a Washington Park, near the White House ? Ah... of course, Ted Kennedy drove him off a bridge.
Posted by Sicario | September 6, 2007 5:27 PM
The man is absolutely correct with regard to the mainstream media coverage. They seem more than willing to exploit toe tapping sexual innuendo while skimming over possible presidential power influence peddling. Where he is now doesn't really matter, with this kind of alzheimer's coverage, Hsu will return and run for the Congress.
Posted by Larry Stone | September 7, 2007 6:29 AM