UPDATE 6:40 P.M. -- NRO's Mark Krikorian reports the Senate voted 69-23 to begin debate. I'm no parliamentarian, but I believe that, since a filibuster requires 41 votes, this means when the time comes to end debate -- to put the measure to a vote -- an additional 18 "no" votes would be required to block a vote. At any rate, the debate begins with 23 senators so opposed to the measure that they don't even want to debate it.
UPDATE 6:45 P.M -- Instead of finishing the debate this week, as previously announced, the Senate has agreed to delay the final vote until June. Complete details to follow ...
UPDATE 7:30 P.M. -- At Ace of Spades HQ, Jack M. divides the Senate into 69 villains and 23 heroes -- the "heroes" being those who voted against proceeding with the debate. Interestingly, among the Democratic "heroes" who voted "no" was Montana Sen. Jon Tester, elected last year with major help from the left-wing "netroots."
UPDATE 7:50 p.m. -- Here's the official roll call vote. Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican, calls it a "railroad job," and Hot Air's AllahPundit comments:
The left knows this is its best shot, even better than under a Democratic president in 2009. ... This is Pelosi's clean-hands, blame-Bush golden chance at amnesty. It'll be hard to resist.
UPDATE 8:45 P.M. -- Newt Gingrich just finished an interview segment on "O'Reilly," and strongly condemned the Senate bill. Bryan Preston of HotAir.com will have video.
EARLIER:
Seldom has the conservative blogosphere been as active on a single issue as it is about the Senate immigration bill, which is due for its first vote today. Lots of bloggers are linking to today's Stephen Dinan/S.A. Miller article -- discuss it at our "Insider" blog, which also links to the full text of the bill -- and other bloggers are linking to our "Immigration debacle" editorial.
This thing is so huge, we're going to do a comprehensive blog wrap-up that will be updated throughout the afternoon ...
1. Michelle Malkin is angry with Senate Republicans for what she calls a "shamnesty" bill. Having seen Mrs. Malkin mildly annoyed -- our interview earlier this month ran long, and she was running late for another appointment -- I'm sure I'd never want to see her angry. But she'll be guest-hosting "The O'Reilly Factor" tonight, so watch out, Senate Republicans.
2. Kate O'Beirne of National Review says:
"Amnesty" doesn't accurately describe the generosity of the grand compromise immigration bill. "Christmas" is closer, but not descriptive enough. How about "Amnesty with a $500,000 cash bonus?"
3.
Mary Katharine Ham has details of a conference call with Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, including:
"Maybe some of the emotion will cool off and die down a little bit so we can have a discussion. ...
"I understand the frustration and anger that people feel after a generation of a broken system."
Also, Miss Ham has
today's back-and-forth between Mr. McCain and his Republican presidential rival, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.
4. John Hawkins of Right Wing News urges his readers to contact their senators and Republican officials:
These Republicans senators are shaky, scared, and looking for an out. If we continue to bring relentless pressure to bear on them, they'll find excuses not to support the bill. ...
But, if they're not hearing from their constituents every day, they'll delude themselves into thinking that the passion behind the issue is starting to drain away. Don't let that happen!
Pick up that phone, write that email, send that fax -- heck, do all three if you're so inclined.
5. Also on the McCain blogger conference call: James Joyner, Ed Morrissey and Ann Althouse. Ryan Sager headlines his New York Sun blog post: "McCain Hits Romney Hard."
6. Patterico relates the immigration issue to welfare:
Bringing illegals out of the shadows would presumably make them eligible for benefits other citizens enjoy -- such as unemployment benefits. This will create a need for a new underclass of illegals that can't receive such benefits. ... My solution would be to get Americans off welfare. Instead, we appear to be headed towards bringing illegals "out of the shadows" and into the bright light of the government dole.
7. Jammie Wearing Fool: "This turkey has to be squashed pronto, especially if Republicans want to maintain any support in the base."
8. La Shawn Barber: "I'm so glad pro-enforcement Republican and conservative bloggers are revolting and making a ruckus over this putrid bill."
9. Tammy Bruce says it's "time to spread the love," giving the phone numbers of senators who publicly oppose the immigration bill.
10. Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit is following the issue (also here and here), and offers his own thought:
Okay, I had this thought last night as I was drifting off to sleep. But the Nyquil wore off and I still think it may make sense.
Lots of people think that the immigration bill stinks, and want to punish the GOP by staying home in 2008. Fair enough. But if you plan to punish the GOP in 2008, then you might want to support the immigration bill now. Why? Because if the Democrats win the White House and Congress in 2008, you'll get a bill that you like a whole lot less! So if you plan to punish the Republicans later, you should encourage them to pass their bill now . . . .
This shows why blogging under the influence of Nyquil is
never a good idea. Just say "no," kids.
11. Debbie Schlussel is no fan of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, whom she accuses of pushing "AmnesTea."
12. Also no fan of Mr. Chertoff, AllahPundit of HotAir.com, with video:
Here's Bush's own secretary of homeland security displaying raw contempt for the wishes of his party's base by floating a derisive laugh line that would have fallen flat even on dKos.
13. OK, final update for now -- a "Star Wars" allusion from the inimitable Ace of Spades:
As noted city administrator Lando Calrissian said, "This deal keeps getting worse and worse."
May the Force be with you ....
-- Robert Stacy McCain, assistant national editor