UPDATE: Gonzales hearing postponed due to Virginia Tech shooting.
Sen. Chuck Schumer is not impressed with the opening statement that Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales is preparing to give to the Senate Judiciary Committee tomorrow morning.
"The opening statement of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales does not advance his cause at all," Mr. Schumer said this afternoon on a conference call with reporters. "So the questions he is asked and the answers he will give on Tuesday will be make-or-break for him."
Mr. Schumer, New York Democrat, said none of his questions are answered in the text of Mr. Gonzales' statement, which is 25 pages long.
"The attorney general has said he wasn't involved in discussions about the firings, but his former chief of staff says that that was an inaccurate statement," Mr. Schumer said. "That's not the only contradiction. He also told us that he would never make a U.S. attorney change for political reasons. It is now clear that he did."
"He said that the U.S. attorneys were dismissed for performance reasons. We now know that they have received outstanding performance evaluations," Mr. Schumer said.
Earlier we wrote that Mr. Gonzales is planting his flag on the contention that none of the eight fired U.S. attorneys was dismissed because of an ongoing corruption probe they were conducting, or not conducting.
"An improper reason would be: 'The replacement of one or more U.S. attorneys in order to impede or speed along particular criminal investigations for illegitimate reasons,'" Mr. Gonzales's prepared testimony reads.
"I know that I did not, and would not, ask for a resignation of any individual in order to interfere with or influence a particular prosecution for partisan political gain. I also have no basis to believe that anyone involved in this process sought the removal of a U.S. attorney for an improper reason," Mr. Gonzales will say.
Mr. Schumer did acknowledge that the investigation into the firings "goes to a very specific question" and then listed three more questions.
"Why were these seven U.S. attorneys fired?"
"Why are there so many contradictions and vagueness in the answers as to why?"
"And then, of course, ultimately, were any of them fired because they either would or would not pursue a specific case that somebody wanted them to pursue or not pursue?"
That last point is exactly what Mr. Gonzales says the key issue is. The more he can keep the hearing focused on that, the better off he will be.
However, don't expect Mr. Schumer to restrict himself only to that topic.
-- Jon Ward, White House correspondent, The Washington Times