The voting hasn't begun, so it's time for some what-ifs.
Number one, what if Ron Paul beats a supposed top-tier candidate here in Iowa tonight? It will obviously be brutal for the politician who comes in lower, but does Paul get a second look from Republican primary voters? His strategy has been based on drawing disaffected voters in to take part in the process, but he can't win a Republican primary from them alone. A strong showing here, plus the giant campaign treasury he's amassed, put him in good shape to argue for another look.
As an aside, if Paul beats one of the five other major candidates, how can future debates justify leaving him out?
Number two, what if Mike Huckabee wins the Iowa caucuses and Sen. John McCain wins the New Hampshire primary? So far, they've been incredibly cordial to each other, mainly because they have a common foe in Mitt Romney right now. But if they have to go head-to-head as the front-runners after Jan. 8, who goes negative first? For that matter, After Huckabee's odd press conference earlier this week, can he ever go negative again?
Number three, how does McCain spin his finish here? If he's third, it means he topped Fred Thompson, who put in a major effort here. But if he's not third, can he still claim not to have cared much about Iowa, given his last-minute swing through here and his on-ground operation thanks to Sen. Sam Brownback, the former candidate who is now backing McCain? McCain yesterday told reporters it's up to them how to portray it.
— Stephen Dinan, national political reporter, The Washington Times
Comments (5)
I love the last line: McCain tells reporters it's up to them how they portray it. Since the media has now moved on to boost McCain -- by the way, how will they decide if it comes to boosting McCain or Huckabee if we end up seeing a two-man race? -- I expect they'll be very favorable to McCain in any post-race coverage. The media's now salivating over a McCain comeback -- well, at least until the nomination's done, when they'll turn on him in a minute.
Posted by D. | January 3, 2008 11:29 AM
Hey, buddy, $20 million dollars for the 'under-dog' and only $5 million for the 'leader' (Huckabee)...
Seems to me that Paul has already been chosen...
How can you pundits continue to overlook the significance of a $20 million dollar haul in this crowded field?
Posted by Michael | January 3, 2008 11:46 AM
"how can future debates justify leaving him out"
By using the same logic MSM uses to pick our candidates for us.
The government tries to usurp our rights and MSM tries to usurp our thought process.
They both think they know what we need.
Posted by Mair | January 3, 2008 11:54 AM
"Ron Paul beat a supposed top-tier candidate"
Won't that just be a kick in the pants?
Waiting with baited breath.
Posted by RM | January 3, 2008 11:55 AM
According to the latest polls.. Paul is in good shape for third in Iowa http://www.pollster.com/08-IA-Rep-Pres-Primary.php
He's trending upwards and the telephone polls are not picking up his supporters. So if he has that much support from the traditional Republican base then your questions may well be a serious issue for the media.
Posted by buck | January 3, 2008 12:25 PM