body bg wrapper bg wrapper bg home news opinion sections classifieds affiliates
advertisement

« Hillary on fire, calls Obama's tactics 'the worst kind' | Main | A candid conversation with HRC »

Response to Clinton attack: Facts are facts


RESPONSE TO CLINTON ATTACK: Facts are facts


 "Everything in those mailers is completely accurate, unlike the discredited attacks from Hillary Clinton's negative campaign that have been rejected in South Carolina, Wisconsin, and across America.  We look forward to having a debate this Tuesday on the facts, and the facts are that Senator Clinton was a supporter of NAFTA and the China permanent trade treaties until this campaign began.  And she herself has said that under the Clinton health care plan, she would consider "going after the wages" of Americans who don't purchase health insurance, whether they can afford it or not," said Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton.


HILLARY CLINTON ON ENFORCING HER MANDATE: "And the reason why I think there are a number of mechanisms, going after people's wages, automatic enrollment, when you are at the place of employment, you will be automatically enrolled, whatever the mechanism is." [ABC's This Week, 2/3/08]


CLINTON'S CAMPAIGN ON COMPARING A DEMOCRAT TO BUSH: "If you want to talk about tactical political maneuvering, it's about one Democrat comparing another Democrat to George Bush. That's the worst kind of tactical political maneuvering." Clinton Spokesman Howard Wolfson [AP, 12/20/07]


CLINTON ON TRADE WITH CHINA:


2000: Hillary Clinton Claimed China's Entry Into The World Trade Organization Would Be Good For American Workers Despite The Already Massive Trade Deficit With China. "I know many people, here in Western New York in particularly and Erie Country, are concerned about this vote, and I share the concerns that many of my supporters in organized labor have expressed to me, because I do think we have to make sure that we improve labor rights, we improve environmental standards in our bilateral and our multilateral trade agreements. But on balance, I've looked at this, I've studied it, I think it is in the interests of America and American workers that we provide the option for China to go into the WTO." [CNN, 4/26/2000]


2000: Hillary Clinton Supported Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) For China, Claimed It Would Create Leverage. "Senate candidate Hillary Clinton said Thursday she supported permanent normal trade relations for China, but slammed Beijing's restrictive birthrate policies." [AFP, 5/25/00]


SOME FACTS ON CLINTON'S SUPPORT FOR NAFTA:


2006/2008: Newsday Reviewed Clinton's Statements, Concluded She Supported NAFTA.   According to a Newsday issues rundown, "Clinton thinks NAFTA has been a boon to the economy." Newsday wrote in 2008, the word "boon" was their "characterization of how we best understood her position on NAFTA, based on a review of past stories and her public statements."   [New York Newsday, 9/11/06; Newsday blog, 2/15/08]


2003: Hillary Clinton Expounded on Benefits of NAFTA, Calling it An Important Legislative Goal. "Creating a free trade zone in North America — the largest free trade zone in the world — would expand U.S. exports, create jobs and ensure that our economy was reaping the benefits, not the burdens, of globalization. Although unpopular with labor unions, expanding trade opportunities was an important administration goal. The question was whether the White House could focus its energies on two legislative campaigns at once [NAFTA and health care]. I argued that we could and that postponing health care would further weaken its chances." [Living History, 182]


2003: Clinton Called NAFTA a "Victory" For President Clinton. In her memoir, published in 2003, Clinton wrote, "Senator Dole was genuinely interested in health care reform but wanted to run for President in 1996. He couldn't hand incumbent Bill Clinton any more legislative victories, particularly after Bill's successes on the budget, the Brady bill and NAFTA." [Living History, p.231]


1996: Clinton Said "I Think Everybody Is In Favor Of Free And Fair Trade. I Think NAFTA Is Proving Its Worth." A questioner pointed out that UNITE opposes the North American Free Trade Agreement, backed by the Clinton administration, on grounds it sends American jobs to Mexico. In March 1996, three years after President Clinton signed NAFTA into law, Hillary Clinton said, "I think everybody is in favor of free and fair trade. I think NAFTA is proving its worth," she said, adding that if American workers can compete fairly, they can match any competition. "That's what a free and fair trade agreement like NAFTA is all about," she said. [AP, 3/6/96]


1996: Clinton "Vowed That Her Husband Would Continue To Support Economic Growth In South Texas Through Initiatives Such As The North American Free Trade Agreement." AP wrote, "Mrs. Clinton vowed that her husband would continue to support economic growth in South Texas through initiatives such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Rio Grande Valley empowerment zone, which allows tax breaks to businesses that relocate to the border." [AP, 11/2/96]


1996: Hillary Clinton "Touted" President Clinton's Support for NAFTA, Saying it Would Reap Widespread Benefit.  On a trip to Brownsville, Texas, Clinton "touted the president's support for the North American Free Trade Agreement, saying it would reap widespread benefits in the region."  [United Press International, 11/1/96]


COMMENTATORS AGREE CLINTON HAS SUPPORTED NAFTA AND FREE TRADE


Sirota: "What A Total Joke" That Clinton Camp Tries to Argue She Did Not Support NAFTA, "Clinton Has Made Statements Unequivocally Trumpeting NAFTA." In response to Barack Obama's attack on NAFTA, the Hillary Clinton campaign has gone into meltdown mode…The Huffington Post has followed along with a laugh-out-loud piece in which the chief architects of NAFTA (many who are now wealthy corporate lawyers and lobbyists) are now saying, no, no, Hillary Clinton was really opposed to it. These are the same people, of course, who are looking for jobs in the Hillary Clinton White House. What a total joke, really. This campaign clearly thinks we are all just a bunch of fools. Hillary Clinton has made statements unequivocally trumpeting NAFTA as the greatest thing since sliced bread." [David Sirota, 2/14/08]


Bloomberg: Clinton "Praised" NAFTA, Friends Said She Was "A Free-Trader at Heart." Bloomberg News reported, "Clinton promoted her husband's trade agenda for years, and friends say that she's a free-trader at heart. 'The simple fact is, nations with free-market systems do better,'' she said in a 1997 speech to the Corporate Council on Africa. 'Look around the globe: Those nations which have lowered trade barriers are prospering more than those that have not.' Praise for Nafta At the 1998 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, she praised corporations for mounting 'a very effective business effort in the U.S. on behalf of NAFTA.'' She added: 'It is certainly clear that we have not by any means finished the job that has begun.' Clinton 'is committed to free trade and to the growing role of the international economy,' said Steven Rattner, a Clinton fundraiser and co-founder of Quadrangle Group LLC, a New York buyout firm. 'She would absolutely do the right thing as president.' There was little evidence of a protectionist tilt to Clinton's trade views during either her 2000 campaign or first years in the Senate. She stressed issues such as homeland security and children's health care, and wasn't a major voice in trade-policy debates. As she began to gear up for a White House run, Clinton became less of a free-trade booster and more skeptical about the payoff of globalization." [Bloomberg News, 3/30/07]


Clinton's NAFTA Rhetoric Is Not Driven By Policy. Bloomberg News reported, "Clinton's positioning on trade reflects the changing nature of the debate in the U.S., which increasingly focuses on concerns over outsourcing and the shift of jobs to other nations such as China and India rather than on the benefits of tariff reductions. It also -- as with Republicans grappling over illegal immigration -- demonstrates the extent to which grassroots sentiment can alter candidates' platforms. A Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll conducted in January found 39 percent of Democrats believe free trade hurts the economy; only 18 percent say it is a benefit.  Both parties agree that a backlash on trade helped Democrats in the 2006 elections. West Virginia Senator Jay Rockefeller, a Democrat, said U.S. workers have been ‘so decimated' by unfettered competition that ‘I think the American people understand they will be hit by it.' Clinton promoted her husband's trade agenda for years, and friends say that she's a free-trader at heart." [Bloomberg News, 3/30/07]


SF Chronicle: "Add to this Democratic front-runner Sen. Hillary Clinton's coolness to the idea. Her husband moved earth and sky to win passage of the NAFTA trade pact with Mexico and Canada in 1993. Now she favors periodic reviews to continue such deals, a "timeout" on new ones, and more federal officials to oversee complaints. It's clearly a flip-flop favor to unions and industry sectors hit by layoffs and cheap imports and bid to outflank her rival, Sen. Barack Obama, who is more favorable to free trade." [San Francisco Chronicle, 10/12/07]


BILL CLINTON CONTINUES TO ARGUE FOR NAFTA


JANUARY 2008: Bill Clinton Says "A Lot Of People Think NAFTA's A Bigger Problem Than it Is." During an event in Las Vegas, Clinton said "She [Hillary Clinton] believes that NAFTA, she believes that all our trade agreements should be reviewed in the first 90 to 120 days of taking office.  She would have a total moratorium on all new trade deals until we conducted a review.  And one of the things that we have to examine is the point I made earlier. That is, is the trade agreement basically fair, but we just don't enforce it.  A lot of people think that NAFTA's a bigger problem than it is.  Our problem with Mexico, our trade deficit with Mexico is mostly because we buy oil from them." [Bill Clinton, 1/18/08]


— Brian DeBose, national political reporter, The Washington Times

Comments (8)

The NAFTA argument is only one element of the political rhetoric engaged by Clinton and Obama. Only the Clinton's have initiated accusations and set the negative tone of these campaigns. First Bill made those stinging but false accusations about Senator Obama which seemed to have stimulated the rise of public sentiment in Barack's favor. Afterwards, we heard Hillary's accusations about Barack's qualifications. However as Barack has continued to climb in the polls, I would assume he knows he now has to defend his campaign. By beginning to point out the real Hillary Clinton's flip-flop on NAFTA, he has the potential to open a vast reservoir of validated information about her. However owing to his high morals and character, I do not believe he would. Hillary's political flip-flop on the NAFTA issue is a minor facet of her history. Several authors in widely separated and possibly uncoordinated publications have written books about her that even if marginally true would make one ask are we seeing the real Hillary Rodham Clinton. For instance, the following books may have shown a side of her we have not seen: "Inside the White House" (Page 244), by Ronald Kessler; "Inside", (page 213) by Joseph Califono; "American Evita" (Pages 90, 259), by Christopher Anderson; "Crossfire", (Page 80); The "First Partner" (Page 259); "Hillary's Scheme" (Page 89); "Unlimited Access" (Page 139); by Gary Aldrige; "The Truth About Hillary", (Page 5), by Edward Klein; "Dereliction of Duty", (Page 71-72) represent only a partial list. I would like to believe comments these authors attribute to her are false, but so many of them seem to have a common theme. She is portrayed as having been been very caustic towards those that worked for her from Secret Service agents assigned to the White House to State Troopers providing her security in Arkansas. As I only read "Unlimited Access", I can only confirm that the above page I reference, possibly shows a side of her that appears directly opposite of what I have been seeing on TV. It may not be wise to sling mud if you have a much smaller bucket than the other side.

It's funny how the last 3 elections Florida's vote didn't count... I guess if you don't like how Florida votes just disregard them!!! What is going to happen to the two states votes??? Just don't count them so Obama wins??? Wouldn't taking the election over be unfair to the people that voted for Hillary???

The Obama people keep accusing the Clintons for stealing the super delegates... But the super delegates are going to the Obama side!!! I thought that the super delegates voted before the election started??? That way if they did... They should stay with Hilary not got with Obama!!!

Indeed it would seem that the last people that want to go negative is the Billary campaign. The restraint shown thus far by the Obama campaign would certainly not be shown by any Republican candidate.

Unlike some people I happen to believe that Hillary under different circumstances would be a candidate that I might could vote for.

For example if she had made a clean break by divorcing her playboy husband who had shown no respect for her; she could have begun to be her own person with her own identity and show others that she had respect for herself.

But their's is a marriage of convenience both in name and politically speaking. She made a calculated bet that she could do more with him than she could accomplish on her own.

If this campaign has shown us anything it is that "Clinton Fatigue" is still very much alive and deep seated in the public consciousness. The thought of Bill further desecrating the White House has this voter in full mode of anybody but Hillary.

It will be interesting in November to see whether or not the Republicans and the Independents that have flocked to Obama will continue to go that way in the general election. I suspect that a lot of those votes were mainly interested in derailing Hillary's campaign.

I don't doubt that the country is ready to elect a woman or a person of color to be President but she's not the woman that will do it. It remains to be seen if Obama will be a historical first.

Are the Votes from Florida & Massechettes ever going to be counted??? This is just like the last twp elections when not all the votes count!!! Why don't you ever discuss about those instead of talking bad about the Clintons all the time...

It's really nice when you say things about Hillary that are completely different what she has said!!! I guess it is to hard to report the News the way it should be rather than how you think it should be reported... It's a shame when a Paper that is supposed to have good standings... Act like a cheap Newspaper...

There is the possibility that some of Bill Clinton's influence peddling schemes border on being illegal. Therefore we (the voters) have the right to see his and Hillary's income tax statement before we are saddled with her as the Democratic nominee. Before Hillary and Bill Clinton can be allowed to re-occupy the Oval Office the voters have to know how the Clintons amassed a multi million dollar fortune since leaving the White House. Especially in view or the facts that Bill Clinton has peddled his influence in Kazakhstan for Canadian billionaire Frank Giustra for the country's uranium rights; He has , or had, a financial partnership with the Emir of Dubai and his buddy Ron Burkle; Bill Clinton has earned millions ‘consulting’ for InfoUSA, an Iowa company that is under investigation for creating telemarketing lists used to fleece the elderly out of their life’s savings.

i will

Blacks 4 Barack
(A Multi-Racial Org.)

Announces:

The 'WE WILL NOT BE CHEATED'
Phone Campaign To DNC !

Out of desperation, the Clinton campaign has stooped to extreme lows by having surrogate Geraldine Ferraro in the media making racist statements against Barack Obama combined with prompting the media to attempt to chastise Obama for rhetoric spewd by not him....but by his preacher! Realistically speaking, it is a fact that even if Hillary wins Pennsylvania there is absolutely no way she can get enough delegate votes to defeat Obama. And her BIG ploy now is to have a 're-do' in Michigan and Florida, despite the fact that this would be a changing of the rules in the middle of the game which should not be allowed. (rules that Howard Dean of the DNC, Harold Ickes, a chief Hillary advisor and Donna Brazil a regular on CNN who never exposes that she helped set the rules in August of 2007 as a member of the DNC Laws and ByLaws Committee)

If allowed to have the rules changed for her benefit, Hillary then hopes that, after stealing the nomination, she will offer Obama the V.P. slot....figuring that if he excepts, Obama supporters will vote for her....while if he does not....she would at least look like she offered the slot. THIS IS UNEXCEPTABLE !

Hillary Clinton's (and the DNC's)coniving tactics will end up ruining the Democratic Party. Now is the time to let Howard Dean, Donna Brazil, Harold Ickes and the entire DNC know that if Hillary wins through ANY methods deemed trickery (which is the only way she can win) WE....THE PEOPLE WILL NOT SUPPORT HER IN THE GENERAL ELECTION !
National radio talk show host Warren Ballentine is asking EVERYONE to call the DNC at 202-863-8000 to let them know 'We Will Not Support A Cheater !'

We need 50 thousand Americans of all ages, races and creeds to FLOOD THE PHONES !!! Call Today !!!! 202-863-8000. Say It Loud....WE WILL NOT SUPPORT A CHEATER.....PERIOD!!! Tell everyone you know to make this call. The Time Is NOW....for the Re-Birth of America !!!!

NOTE: The Media refuses to inform America that OBAMA WON TEXAS !!!!!

Visit: www.Blacks4Barack.org
(A Multi-Racial Organization)

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated.)

The 

Washington Times Advertising Links


 

The Washington Times - Brighter. Bolder. Privacy Policy | About TWT | Site Map | Contact Us
Advertise | Subscription Services
All site contents copyright © The Washington Times, LLC.

home news opinion sections classifieds affiliates