Oh, that wacky NCAA
When ACC commissioner John Swofford addressed reporters last week, he mentioned how the NCAA had done away with the Division I-A and Division I-AA designations.
Then he paused a moment to remember exactly what the new names were, before politely asking the assembled media to pick up on the updated terminology he hadn't entirely grasped yet.
Groovy, man.
Welcome to the NCAA's latest self-created situation that will only wind up being a greater nuisance -- the era of the "Football Bowl Subdivision" and the "Football Championship Division." And you don't even need a cover sheet for a TPS report to use the new terms.
In all seriousness, there was no obvious reason to change the appellations other than to remind folks the big boys don't have a playoff system. Is "I-AA" a denigration to those quality teams in the Big Sky and Southern conferences? It never really seemed like it, and an awkward new name isn't going to enhance the quality of play or respect for recent I-AA champions Appalachian State, James Madison and Delaware.
More importantly, it was an understood line of demarcation. The only thing remotely befuddling about the difference in divisions was figuring out which teams were in the process of moving from one to the other (next up to the former Division I-A: Western Kentucky in 2009).
From a strictly media point of view, there are three options in how to handle this:
1. Stick with the old, familiar terminology and technically be wrong all the time.
2. Wholeheartedly embrace the new monikers at the risk of utter confusion for readers who haven't heard of the inane name changes.
3. Use the new terms but also refer to either division as “the former Division I-A or I-AA," thus cluttering up something that was expressed in far more elegant terms in the past.
Oh well. Guess it's time to start thinking about Football Bowl Subdivision member Maryland's season opener against longtime Football Championship Subdivision member Villanova on Sept. 1.