The Western world recoiled in horror when an 11-year-old Afghan girl, betrothed to a 40-year-old man, was highlighted as the UNICEF Photo of the Year:

UNICEF explains:
He's 40, she's 11. And they are a couple -- the Afghan man Mohammed F.* and the child Ghulam H.*. "We needed the money", Ghula's parents said. Faiz claims he is going to send her to school. But the women of Damarda village in Afghanistan's Ghor province know better: "Our men don't want educated women." They predict that Ghulam will be married within a few weeks after her engagement in 2006, so as to bear children for Faiz.
During her stay in Afghanistan, it consistently struck American photographer Stephanie Sinclair how many young girls are married to much older men. She decided to raise awareness about this topic with her pictures. Particularly as the official minimum age for brides in Afghanistan is 16 and it is therefore illegal to marry children.
This story touches on one of the most powerful influences of culture, namely the question of what is right and proper in terms of sexuality, marriage and family life. Writing in the
German magazine Spiegel, Leon de Winter says:
We are beholding the fiercest barbarism imaginable. But a carefree cultural relativism -- which this age has donned as its outward manifestation of decadent indifference -- allows many to simply look away. They turn away from the sight of an 11-year-old girl, who is about to be raped by the man sitting next to her.
The revulsion seems universal, from
Michelle Malkin to feminist blogger
Melissa McEwan, who writes:
The terror in that little girl's eyes breaks my heart into a thousand pieces -- especially because we are meant to have freed her; we are meant to have given her a better life.
'Expanding like mosquitos'
One of Malkin's commenters, Rational Thought, observes:
Mark Steyn is being called before a Canadian "human rights commission" for the crime of pointing out in his best-selling book "America Alone" that the flavor [of] Islam illustrated in that photo above is incompatible with Western democracy. We musn't criticize such multiculturalism because, you know, that 11-year-old girl really wants to be raped by that nasty old deviant. She has 2 choices: submit to the rape, or have her father/uncles/cousins slit her throat. But, hey, don't you dare call such practices incompatible with Western democracy. Don't you dare. God help us. Where's the outrage?
At
Human Events Online, Robert Spencer talks about the Steyn case:
To be sure, the article was pretty strong stuff. Here's a bit of it: "There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe -- without swords, without guns, without conquests. The 50 million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades." Even worse, it goes on to say: "Just look at the development within Europe, where the number of Muslims is expanding like mosquitoes. Every Western woman in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim woman in the same countries is producing 3.5 children." ...
There were just two problems: The "Muslim continent" statement is not only factual, it's stated in words no one can characterize as inflammatory. (Also, it's been said by Libya's strongman Muammar Qaddafi). Second, "The number of Muslims is expanding like mosquitoes" was not Steyn's phrase. He was quoting Mullah Krekar, a jihadist who currently resides in Norway, although officials have been trying for years to get him out of the country.
Demography and fertility
There is an important connection between Ghulam the 11-year-old bride and the demographic issues that have made Mark Steyn a thought-criminal in Canada.
According to the Population Reference Bureau, the total fertility rate (TFR, average lifetime births per woman) in Afghanistan is 6.8, compared to 1.5 in Europe and Canada. One of the reasons for this demographic differential is that early marriage and early motherhood are customary in Afghanistan. The 11-year-old child bride is an extreme manifestation of this phenomenon.
In the West, meanwhile, for four decades, the trend has been toward postponing marriage and motherhood, with the result being a decline in fertility. In 1960, the median age at first marriage for U.S. women was 20, and TFR was 3.5. In 2006, the median age at first marriage for women is 25, and TFR is 2.1.
As Ben Wattenberg of the American Enterprise Institute has explained, "Fertility delayed is fertility denied."
However, delaying marriage doesn't necessarily delay motherhood. Earlier this month, it was reported that more than 38 percent of U.S. births are to unmarried women. Federal officials, however, decided to highlight a relatively minor uptick in teen birth rates, which increased 3 percent. The real news about teen births, however, is that they are near an all-time historic low, having declined 34 percent since 1991. For girls 15-19, the "age-specific fertility rate" in 1960 was 89 according to the Census Bureau's International Data Base, whereas in 2007, it was 58.
Jamie Lynn: What's the scandal?
A week ago, bloggers reacted with scorn, outrage and ridicule when it was revealed that Britney Spears' 16-year-old sister Jamie Lynn is pregnant. Blogging at Wendy Shalit's Modesty Zone, Allison Josephs writes:
Is it simply a matter of age then? On the same web page that People.com announces Jamie Lynn's "teen pregnancy" we also learn that, 22 year old singer Lily Allen is pregnant from a boyfriend she's been dating for only three months. But this couple is "obviously . . . thrilled by the news" according to Allen's rep, whereas poor Jamie Lynn's situation is what we Jews call a shanda.
Now I know that 22 is older than 16, but what if Jamie Lynn were 17, 18, or 19? . . . 70% of People.com readers polled think that Jamie's Nickelodeon show should be canceled since she got herself into this mess and only 18% say they feel any sympathy for her. I'm wondering what percent of these people are OK with a sixteen year old having sex? Probably more than 18%.
This highlights a major cultural difference: Americans are outraged by an 11-year-old girl getting married in Afghanistan; in Afghanistan, the outrage would be directed toward the 16-year-old -- or anyone else -- having sex (and babies) without being married.
Having babies is a natural consequence of having sex, and there was a time in American when being married was considered a prerequisite for both sex and motherhood. As Maggie Gallagher has observed:
What we have called our 'teen pregnancy' crisis is not really about teenagers. Nor is it really about pregnancy. It is about the decline of marriage.
But while Mark Steyn is in hot water for condemning the "barbarism" that endorses 11-year-old brides in Afghanistan, political correctness forbids condemnation of the trend that produces a 38 percent illegitimacy rate in the United States. As Leon de Winter says, "a carefree cultural relativism" is an "outward manifestation of decadent indifference."
-- Robert Stacy McCain, assistant national editor, The Washington Times