Sen. Barack Obama late last night picked up an endorsement from D.C. Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, a super delegate who said he is what "our country, our party and this city needs at this turning point in our history."
Norton said she had planned to wait until closer to the general election to endorse a candidate. But "as a super delegate, I decided I had to speak up now to separate myself from the idea that is afoot for the first time that super delegates, especially those who have not announced their choice, could or should decide our nominee under some circumstances."
"The notion that a candidate who has not earned delegates could become the Democratic nominee for president is at odds with the democratic principles of our party reforms. Super delegates were never intended to allow the return of smoked-filled room, behind the scenes selection of our candidate," Norton continued. "I have carried a banner for a democracy of the District of Columbia too long to depart from principles of democracy within my own party."
"I appreciate that Senator Obama is not new to D.C. voting rights but is a co-sponsor of our D.C. Voting Rights bill," she said. "I believe that Senator Obama as president will be invaluable in helping to shift left-over home rule authority from the Congress that should be with the city."
I have a story up this morning about the importance of the Potomac region's trio of primaries.
Sen. Barack Obama aimed to continue his streak of victories with decisive wins in the Potomac region's trio of primary elections today as Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton already was looking ahead to bigger contests to make up for lost ground.
Obama volunteers working the crowd for him at a University of Maryland rally yesterday pushed supporters to sign up to canvass neighborhoods in both states, while D.C. Democrats were treated to automated phone calls from Mayor Adrian M. Fenty.
"Imagine a president who will put principle ahead of polls ... now imagine knowing that you made it possible. Vote for Barack Obama tomorrow," Mr. Fenty says on the calls.
Clinton volunteers worked the phones to get out the vote, and Republicans also vote today in the three contests.
Read the rest here.
Check out this pretty amazing Washington Times photo gallery with audio focusing on Sen. Hillary Clinton, courtesy of photo diva Katie Falkenberg.
Also, Gary Emerling has a great piece up today on the energized youth vote.
Michelle Obama this morning sent supporters a note to say "America is watching the District of Columbia" and urging them to get out and vote.
"We're heading into today's primary after winning all four contests this weekend, but this race is still extremely close," she said.
Clinton sent supporters a note today as well:
You and I have taken a remarkable journey together through this entire campaign. Through all the ups and downs, you have been there when I needed you most. And today, I'm asking you for the most important thing of all — I'm asking for your vote.
Today in Washington, D.C., voters will head out to the polls to make their choice for president. We both know that our country needs a leader who is ready to lead on day one. After seven years of a president who listens only to the special interests, America is ready for a president who brings your voice, your values, and your dreams to the White House.
I'm relying on my strongest supporters like you to help me win the nomination, and there is nothing more important than getting out to vote. When you go to the polls in the District today, bring a friend, a neighbor, or a family member with you - in this highly competitive race for the nomination, every vote matters.
Thank you for all you have done for me and our campaign.
Hillary
UPDATE, 9:05 a.m.: Team Clinton announced this morning astronaut John Glenn is endorsing her at a campaign event in Ohio.
— Christina Bellantoni, national political reporter, The Washington Times
Comments (4)
Interesting how Obama's supporters keep mentioning that Super delegates should vote the will of the people, yet Ted Kennedy and John Kerry are supporting Obama even though Massachusetts voted for Senator Hillary Clinton. I do not want the press, the super delegates, or the "elite" choosing our next president. Let all the votes continue and we will see who the people choose...Hillary and Barack are very close in delegates...it is still too close for all of this posturing and spinning...what would be said if the pledged delegates chose Hillary and the super delegates chose Barack...would their be shouts of a "Smoke filled room"...
Posted by sun | February 12, 2008 1:10 PM
The issue of super delegates and the democratic party is unconscionable. Currently Obama is ahead in the popular vote and behind in the delegate vote. We can not have 800 party insiders decide the primaries for us! I have created a protest page here
http://www.popularprimaryvotenow.com
If you think this is an issue please add a comment to the protest page of the website. I will print out all the comments and give them to the Democratic party.
Posted by avijit ghosh | February 12, 2008 2:10 PM
The Dems will have a problem with voters in the General Election on November 4 if Obama wins in the total number of pledged delegates but does not get the nomination because of the power of super delegates. It will send a negative message to all the voters that took part in the primaries and caucauses that they wasted their time and their vote does not actually matter. It can definetely backfire on November 4 giving the WH to McCain.
Posted by MJG, Castle Rock | February 12, 2008 5:21 PM
The super delegates and party leaders should try to push this to some resolution before too long, It could destroy the party. It will cost us congressional seats, state races and many new and old Democrats.
With the influx of new and young people the party can be the dominate force for a generation. If it goes all the way to the convention and looks like she stole the nomination it will split the party, the republicans will get the inds and obamacans that feel cheated and lose some democrats.
And what happens if, since this is a movement, he takes his 1/2 of the party and walks out, with the Inds and Obamacans and runs as an Ind.? He would have a good chance to win because then he would attract even more inds and republicans. The party would lose all the new young voters and the next generation, it could cost us elections for the next 20 years. Even worse he could win and the democrats would lose a lot of seats in congress due to the backlash, as Obama people make protest votes. I don't think he would do it, unless the convention seemed like a travesty of the Democratic way, proving the old unethical ways of the D.C. politicians has taken over the Democratic party, exactly the unethical behavior he is fighting against. And if you say a third party wouldn't stand a chance, this year is different in many ways, Obama would attract many more unhappy republicans and most of the Inds if he didn't have the Democratic label and he isn't Ross Perot.
And for someone as divisive as Hillary to dismiss Democratic voters as not important is idiotic, the party needs all the votes it can get in November. That shows you she puts herself first and doesn't care about the party, it could cost votes in lesser democratic contests.
Posted by ed | February 13, 2008 9:55 AM