body bg wrapper bg wrapper bg home news opinion sections classifieds affiliates
advertisement

« Clinton meets Tyra Banks | Main | Psst, Hillary: Bill Clinton praised Reagan in '91 »

Democrats feud over Reagan


ELKO — The Clinton campaign hosted a conference call earlier to slam Sen. Barack Obama on his comments praising President Reagan in an interview with the Reno Gazette-Journal. (That paper endorsed him today; Clinton nabbed the Sun endorsement.)


They pointed reporters to this one-liner in a You Tube clip, where Obama says: "I think it's fair to say that the Republicans were the party of ideas for a pretty long chunk of time there over the last 10 to 15 years in the sense that they were challenging conventional wisdom."



Clinton supporter Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) opened the call to say he was "stupefied" by the Obama remarks.


"This kind of explicit endorsement of Ronald Reagan baffles me," he said, deploring Reagan's record on gay rights and women's rights and calling him "a dedicated right winger in every aspect."


The others on the call said Obama is mischaracterizing Reagan's ability to communicate, and said Reagan's defunding of mental institutions led to a major rise in the homeless population.


But here is a longer clip where Obama explains his reasoning.



He tells the Gazette-Journal editorial board that Reagan "changed the trajectory of America in a way that, you know, Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not."


"He tapped into what people were already feeling … [wanting] clarity … optimism … a return to that sense of dynamism and entrepreneurship that had been missing," he said.


Clinton wasn't the only one who noticed.


Former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina put out a statement calling Obama "frightfully" wrong in his assessment.


"The breadth of change Ronald Reagan brought was crippling for millions of Americans with the two worst recessions since the Depression, a complete disregard for the rights of American labor, and tax cuts that lined the pockets of the richest Americans at the expense of fiscal sanity and the well-being of the most vulnerable in our society," Edwards said.


"Senator Obama may have been more interested in contrasting Reagan with Bill Clinton, but it shows particularly bad judgment to suggest this is the kind or even the breadth of change Americans want. Instead of lauding Ronald Reagan, Senator Obama would do better to remember that it was presidents like Teddy Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt or John F. Kennedy who helped move this country forward," he said.


UPDATE/ 2:15 Pacific Time: Team Obama held a conference call with supporters calling it "politics as usual."


Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) said "I don't think it's debatable" that Reagan changed the nation and called the Clinton campaign's complaints a "distortion" and "petty."


Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.) said both he and Obama disagree with most of Reagan's policy, and said the Clinton premise that Obama is embracing Reagan is "foolish."


"Senator Obama is arguing ... that in order to unite the country we need to increase the size of the tent of the Democratic Party," Wexler said, adding that just like the late president created Reagan Democrats in the 1980s, Obama is creating "Obama Republicans and Obama independents."


Christina Bellantoni, national political reporter, The Washington Times

Comments (2)

Quick Study 101 on how to kill your campign stone dead with one comment, its the 2008 equivalent of the Dean Scream that made Democrats sit up and go what the hell was that.

Barack Obama is 100% Correct.

Who are the defenders of the status quo ? Is that you ?
Reagan did spawn a 'sea change' in American politics.
Obama hopes to spawn a new 'sea change'. Change based on the ideals of unity - not division (and certainly not modeled after Reagan's ideas)
How can anyone look at the state of modern politics and the outlook for our country guided by our current stautus quo - how can this 'sea change' of unified working government not make sense.
Anyone who has paid any attention knows what Obama is speaking of about the Republican Party being guided by 'ideas' for the past 15 years... you don't have to subscribe to those ideas but they are, none the less, ideas. The same could be said of the Democratic party of the late 50's and into the 60's - Kennedy Idealism. Both of these movements ran their course and were watered down by time. That explains the state of the Democratic Party in the 70's and 80's. It also explains the 'washed out' state of the Republican Party today.
--- Why do 'we' resent being talked to as if we had the capacity for knowledge. That is how Barack Obama is speaking to America... as if 'we can' understand. Why would we sell ourselves short and believe that we are past our zenith... that we are a declining people. Come on people... Now is the time to show some strength of character.

Hillary Clinton should do her part in making the Democratic Party a party of ideas again. She can start by voting for Barack Obama in November.

Barack Obama for President of the UNITED States of America.

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated.)

The 

Washington Times Advertising Links


 

The Washington Times - Brighter. Bolder. Privacy Policy | About TWT | Site Map | Contact Us
Advertise | Subscription Services
All site contents copyright © The Washington Times, LLC.

home news opinion sections classifieds affiliates