National Geographic: A Muslim Bible?
I'm back here at Belief Blog after weeks of writing about the visit of Pope Benedict XVI who I assume had a nice rest at Castelgandolfo after his six-day sojourn here.
So it's back to commenting on the ins and outs of the God beat. I took home this past weekend some of the new books that have ended up on my desk and was paging through the lavishly illustrated Essential History of the Bible by National Geographic. It's pretty enough to be a gift book.

Then I spotted the strangest thing. Included in a list of biblical holidays in the book is Eid al-Adha, the Islamic feast commemorating Abraham's almost-sacrifice of Ishmael atop Mount Moriah. Whoa. Now the Bible followed by Jews and Christians says that Abraham took Isaac, his second-born, not Ishmael, to the mountain top. Isaac, in the viewpoint of God, was the main act here. Notice Genesis 22 has God calling Isaac "your only son."
I snuck another look at the text, which is purposely vague as to what actually happened with Abraham and his son. Now what was National Geographic thinking? Most Muslims believe the Judeo-Christian Bible to be hopelessly corrupted and that God had to give the Quran six centuries later to Mohammed to set the record straight. But what is a Muslim holiday doing in the Bible? Islam wasn't even founded before the biblical canon was closed.
Then I looked at the National Geographic's description -- later in the book -- of Satan. Again, there's a mention of Islam; this time in terms of the hajj, the annual voyage to Mecca. The hajj includes a ritual whereupon one casts stones at a pillar representing Satan.
Can't National Geographic get its world religions right? The Quran has plenty of references to Christianity and Judaism but the Bible has no references to Islam. One does begin to wonder what the agenda is over there on 17th Street. I remember back around April 2006, when the magazine had this huge press conference announcing its new archeological find: a "Gospel of Judas" which turned out to be neither a gospel nor anything written by the real Judas. Although it was purely a creation of some second-century gnostics with no relation to the real Bible, you would not have guessed that if you'd been present at National Geographic's splashy press conference. Despite banners proclaiming "The secret account of the revelation that Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot," I wasn't in that press conference a half hour before I knew I'd been had.
So, National Geographic's record on what's really in the Bible is a bit sketchy these days. Considering the source, I shouldn't be surprised this organization would mix together Christianity, Judaism and Islam. Maybe they don't see much of a difference between the three.
— Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times
Eldredge has founded a most unusual organization geared to toward helping Christians hear their own hearts - and that of God - in terms of life direction. There is a lot more to his ministry, which began as an effort to helping men discover their own masculinity. Again, that is simplistic but one must read his books to get a drift. I really like his stuff and have been able to interview him twice.