body bg wrapper bg wrapper bg home news opinion sections classifieds affiliates
advertisement

« Jordan: A no-go zone for evangelicals | Main | Easter-free childrens' books »

The Canterbury archbishop and Nigeria's Muslims


I just came across an interesting piece today in Episcopal News Service about a Nigerian religious leader praising the archbishop of Canterbury for his endorsements of sharia law last month. Archbishop Rowan Williams got reamed worldwide for suggesting that some forms of sharia law would work in the UK.


Anyway, the archbishop's remarks went over quite well in northern Nigeria where shariah law has been imposed for nearly a decade, much to the discomfort and danger to the region's Christians and other non-Muslims. In the article, a Muslim sheikh said that non-Muslims need not fear shariah law.


"It is designed and meant for Muslims," he said.


Really? Ask Ben Kwashi, the Anglican bishop of Jos in northern Nigeria, whose family was mauled and his wife tortured by a Muslim gang and marched through the streets naked in 2006 because of because of some cartoons spoofing Mohammed that were published in a Danish newspaper several months before. The bishop was not home during that first attack, which left his wife temporarily blind and unable to walk, but he was there during a second attack, where he miraculously escaped being killed by another gang.


Do a computer search on "Nigeria" and "religious persecution" and you'll be appalled in what's going on in that part of the world. Bishop Jos gave an interview recently on what he thought about the archbishop of Canterbury's remarks and you can read that here.


Muslims and Christians used to live in peace in that area of the world until Muslims began to apply shariah to Christians. Sharia law does not coexist with democracy. It's either all or nothing.


I am friends with a Catholic priest who works in Zamfara state, where sharia law mandates amputating the hands of thieves. I wrote him, saying I feared he might not make it out of there alive.


"Thanks for your prayers and concern," he replied. "As a missionary, I should be prepared for the worst."


Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

Comments (2)

I also found something interesting on the Episcopal News Service. Apparently Archbishop Akinola's may have played a role in fomenting violence between the Christians and Muslims back in 2002 in a dispute over who ran a town council. So my question is...Is the violence based on Sharia or or their other underlying causes that the author does not wish to look at? Has the esteemed Ms. Duin just pushed the hot button argument instead of delving deeper into the conflict which is troubling Nigeria? Lastly is the Archbishop setting up churches here so he has someplace to go when his position in Nigeria becomes untenable?

I would just like to respond here by saying that the whole issue of sharia law seems to be inherently unethical towards women. The injustices I know of, such as women being arrested for being the victim of a rape attack, seem like they should be more than enough to sway anyone against sharia law.


Beebo

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated.)

The 

Washington Times Advertising Links


 

The Washington Times - Brighter. Bolder. Privacy Policy | About TWT | Site Map | Contact Us
Advertise | Subscription Services
All site contents copyright © The Washington Times, LLC.

home news opinion sections classifieds affiliates