body bg wrapper bg wrapper bg home news opinion sections classifieds affiliates
advertisement

Jordan: A no-go zone for evangelicals


King Abdullah of Jordan will be in town Monday, just in time to deal with the news that Jordan has expelled more than two dozen foreign Christians and is denying visas so that overseas evangelicals can study at a popular Amman-based seminary.


The latter is Jordan Evangelical Theological Seminary (JETS), one of a handful of Protestant seminaries in the Middle East. They're not going to be around much longer if their current troubles don't let up. Bone up on the topic by reading this recent story by Compass Direct, an evangelical Christian news service:

  • Jordan: Authorities expel foreign Christians

    and this:

  • Jordan: Officials deport more Christians, deplore Compass Report

    The articles have created a huge stir overseas. An official response from the Jordanian embassy is at the bottom of this post.


    Some of this information dovetails with my own research in what's been happening east of the Jordan River to evangelicals. I've visited the country twice: in 2001 (on a press trip paid for by the Jordanian government) and in 2004 while on my way back from Iraq. It's a beautiful country (my favorite spots: the Dead Sea resorts, Petra and Ajloun) and its tourism bureau is doing a very credible job in trying to market its biblical sites to American Christians. We were introduced to official religious figures who assured us all was well between Christians and Muslims in Jordan. FLAG.jpg


    But in more secretive conversations, I learned that things were not going well for evangelical Jordanian Christians, who are not one of the four types of Christian recognized by the government. I'm not referring to foreign missionaries; these are the natives I am referring to. When I asked then-tourism minister Akel Biltaji about religious persecution there, I got a angry lecture from him and a dressing-down by the head of my tour group for causing problems. Troublesome lot, us reporters.


    The Jordanian flag.


    Just after I returned, I wrote a piece on how American mega-church pastors are bringing truckloads of Christian tourists into Jordan, which has sought to position itself, along with Israel, as a top Middle East destination. I began following some of the many interfaith efforts made by King Abdullah in Amman and here in Washington where he met privately with a group of American evangelical leaders after the 2006 National Prayer Breakfast. No Muslim head of state has ever done that.


    Thus, one would think the Jordanian government would treat their homegrown evangelicals with a bit more deference. I've written about some of the discrimination and harassment endured by these folks but a month ago, I was asked by one of the evangelical Christians (I am being vague here as to whom) to back off, as everything I wrote was causing more problems.


    So I was surprised to get a phone call a few days ago from another of my Jordanian contacts asking for help, as things have gotten even worse. "The problem is the bishops," he said, referring to officials from Armenian, Orthodox and Catholic churches whom, he said, were jealous of how the evangelicals were winning members from other Christian traditions. So they were leaning on their own government to put the pressure on JETS by cutting off its supply of students.


    The politics here gets complicated as you not only have Christian warring against Christian but 8 percent of the Jordanian parliament is made up members of these traditional churches, according to the embassy's Web site. They are a voting bloc King Abdullah may not want to ignore.


    But he may want to put a lid on those from the traditional churches who have been working overtime in heaping abuse on evangelicals. See this link (in Arabic) to an Al Jazeera program featuring two church officials.


    An English translation (thanks to a friend of this newspaper) is also at the bottom of this post). It's pretty sobering, especially if you are a Jordanian evangelical or an American expatriate living in Jordan.


    So, welcome to Washington, your majesty. Please answer this question: Does Jordan adhere to the United Nations' Universal Declaration on Human Rights that allows people to change their religion? If not, why not?


    If so, I understand JETS, despite all its problems, is trying to finish construction on its new campus this summer. See their Web site for details. Wouldn't it be a sign of your even-handedness towards all religions to put in an appearance at their dedication ceremony?


    Here's the embassy's statement:
    Embassy of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
    Washington, DC
    Government of Jordan's Position on Council of Churches Statement Regarding Evangelicals in Jordan


    Jordan strongly believes in religious tolerance and actively upholds the freedom of religion and worship. Jordan also plays an important role in protecting Christian patrimony in the Holy Land in Jordan and the occupied territories in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
    The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is determined to protect and preserve the historic ties between the Christians and Muslims based on our strong belief in the necessity for coexistence and mutual respect. Today, almost 3-4% of Jordan's population, which is Christian, holds 8% of the seats in Parliament in addition to prominent positions in the government, military and business sector.
    The Constitution and the laws in force in Jordan stress the right of the Christian churches to establish their own courts, with their own jurisdiction — on par with the Muslims' Sharia Courts, in matters of Personal Status. Christians have the right to build their own churches and schools, and to establish charity organizations and hospitals; and they have the right to exercise their religious rites with complete freedom as long as this does not interfere with or harm other denominations.
    Jordan welcomes and encourages the humanitarian work by all denominations. Such important work contributes to the atmosphere of coexistence and respect between Christians and Muslims in Jordan and among Christian denominations. The Baptist School in Amman, founded in 1974 with two thousand students currently enrolled, is one important example of such efforts.
    The rights and recognition of formal churches can be divided into different degrees of recognition for Christian groups and churches in Jordan. These categories determine the activities and privileges that the group or Church may benefit from. Christian groups not recognized as churches can nevertheless own land and establish cultural societies and charity organizations, but cannot acquire a license to proselytize, which is only granted to the four traditional churches that are recognized to do missionary work and that represent 95% of the more than 2000-year-old Christian community of Jordan.
    The government regularly meets and consults with members of the recognized Christian authorities to listen to their concerns and to find out how best to address these issues. In this respect, the Council of Church Leaders in Jordan had been complaining for many years about the role of missionary groups in Jordan and the proliferation of missionary work in the Kingdom by various foreign groups and organizations.
    The Government is under the obligation to consider the concerns of its Christian community as expressed by the Council of the Church Leaders in Jordan, which represents 95% of the community. In this regard, the government expects all Christian groups in Jordan to abide by its laws regarding proselytization and public order and in accordance to the rules and regulations that govern their stature and the work of members of their organizations.
    The government is also keen to foster and encourage important inter-Christian dialogue, synergy and harmony to protect the interests of the community as a whole and to guarantee the well being of its citizens, in addition to strengthening and preserving a vibrant Christian community in the Holy Land.


    Here's a partial transcript from a Feb. 17 segment on Al Jazeera:
    Christian Proselytism Groups in Jordan and North Africa
    Program presenter: Khadija Benganna
    Program guests: 'Awda Qawwas, member of the Central Committee of the World Council of Churches
    'Abd al-Salam al-Ballaji, scholar on the activities of Christian proselytism groups
    - Causes of the spread of these groups in Jordan, and the reality of the danger they represent
    - Dimensions of the phenomenon in North Africa, and ways of confronting it

    Khadija Benganna: Dear viewers, welcome to you. In today's program we will focus on a warning from the Council of Churches of Jordan, regarding the existence of evangelistic groups working in the Kingdom under the cover of humanitarian organizations and the danger which they represent for Muslim-Christian relations. In this program we will be asking two questions. How real is the danger which these groups pose for Christianity in Jordan and for Muslim-Christian relations? And how should the evangelistic spread be confronted in other Arab countries, particularly those located in North Africa? The Council of the Heads of Churches in Jordan has issued a warning about the existence of approximately 40 evangelistic groups working in the Kingdom under the cover of humanitarian organizations. Critics of these groups are convinced that they serve American and Israeli purposes, and that they are seeking to divide the churches of the East.
    [Pre-recorded reportage]


    Hassan al-Shubaki (a reporter):
    …These evangelistic groups encounter nothing but rejection from Jordanian Christian clergy. The Jordanian authorities cancelled the residency permits of tens of families of foreign activists in evangelistic organizations last year because of their media campaigns in the foreign press. In response to this, the bishops who represent all of the Christian churches expressed the view that the role of these evangelistic groups harms relations between Christians and Muslims and harms both communities.


    Constantine Qarmash (pastor from the Greek Orthodox Church): Their goal is political. It is to serve Israeli interests in this region. And whereas if we are divided amongst ourselves, we will lose all truth/right [ambiguous, difficult-to-translate phrase here], we are distracted among Orthodox, Born-Again/Renewed, Baptist, Jehovah's Witness.


    Hassan al-Shubaki: The government, for its part, published a declaration from the Council of Churches which contained criticism of the activities of evangelists on Jordanian territory. These groups have a political face which seeks to distort relations between Muslims and Christians…


    Fahd Khaytan (writer/journalist): I think that these evangelistic groups are — I mean — the intellectual spearhead for certain suspect American Zionist groups which for a long time have sought by all means possible to intervene in the internal affairs of Arab peoples, both Arab Christians and Arab Muslims, and which seek to sow discord and division through ecclesiastical ideas which are rejected by the overwhelming majority of Christians in the Arab world.


    Hassan al-Shubaki: Critics of evangelism state that money is fundamental to the activity of the evangelisticals, which began in Palestine and Lebanon and Egypt, then in Jordan, and which has gained only several hundred adherents, amidst fears on the part of government officials and church leaders that these groups would use the freedom of religions in order to cover their political aims. The crisis over evangelistic groups in Jordan is a mixture of religion and politics which the Christian clergy view as representing a threat to Christians and Muslims alike. Hassan al-Shubaki, al-Jazeera, Amman.
    [End of pre-recorded reportage]


    Causes of the spread of these groups, and the reality of the danger they represent:
    Khadija Benganna: Joining us on this program, from Amman, is Dr. 'Awda Qawwas, Member of the Central Committee of the World Council of Churches… Dr. 'Awda Qawwas, who are these "evangelisticals"? You, as Jordanian Christians, why do you reject them, and what do you object to about their evangelism?


    'Awda Qawwas: Good evening, Ms. Khadija. This is a very important questions, and it is particularly important that it be posed at this very point in time, at this stage in Arab political affairs in general. The issue of the Born-Agains/Reneweds or the "evangelisticals" is not an issue in Jordan only: it is an issue from which the whole Arab world is suffering — Egypt, Syria and Lebanon. In Jordan, of course, in the past there was more liberality for their work, and for more than seven years there have been objections from politicians and Christians to their attempt to infiltrate Jordanian society and harm Christian-Christian relations firstly and Muslim-Christian relations secondly. And I think: who are they? This is a big question with many question marks about it. But as for their agenda, it is totally clear in my opinion. Their agenda is to exploit the people of the Arab nation, Arab Christians of all sects, to accomplish their hidden goals, which in the final analysis serve Zionist interests and American interests. Of course no doubt there exists in the Arab world an expression to which I object, namely "Christian Zionism." I acknowledge the existence of such a thing as a Zionized Christian, and thus I think that these evangelisticals and those who cannot rightly deserve to be called by the label "churches" because they are not churches [the run-on grammar of this sentence reflects the Arabic original], for more than ten years I have been calling them "shops" [or "storefronts"?] because in reality they are shops — totally apart from the political problem which they create, they also create a social problem. I'll give you a small example. Suppose that one of these groups performs a wedding and that children are born from this marriage. It is not possible to register them according to the civil status laws in Jordan because they are groups that are not registered as churches and thus do not have the right to have their own ecclesiastical courts. In the past some local churches gave them, but when they discovered their hidden goals, they abandoned them, and thus the problem increased. The government has begun to try to make up for past mistakes by giving them permits through the Ministry of Culture…


    Khadija Benganna (interrupting): But they were given these permits for humanitarian work, not evangelistic work. But you did not answer my first question yet. Who are they? Where do they come from, and from what countries? What sect do they belong to? Who is funding them? Who is directing their movements? What sectors of society are they targeting in their work and in their activity?


    'Awda Qawwas: Most of them are of American nationality. They come as individuals, and they exploit the citizens of this nation, recruiting them for their interests. They are financed by their churches in America. And even in America these churches — or the larger part of them — do not have official recognition. The permits have not been given to them as humanitarian organizations (lest we harm the work of humanitarian organizations), but were given as cultural institutions or theological seminary. And even the Theological Seminary, when their permit was granted, we opposed that because they have no religious authority [i.e. like the Pope or Greek Orthodox Patriarch]; they have no authority Christian doctrine [sic]. Thus we come, and we say that their funding is clear — it comes from foreign sources. And by means of this suspicious funding they are able to lead astray our youth and our daughters because of the existence of neglect by the local ecclesiastical structures. They are able to disseminate and to give and to attract these youth to form small groups which pray in houses and which have no relation to the real Christian doctrine of all of the ancient Arab and Jordanian Christian sects registered in accordance with the Law on Sects in the Ministry of the Interior of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Thus I have answered your question.


    Khadija Benganna: Dr. 'Awda, what are their methods of operation; I mean, how are they able to convert people from one religion to another?


    'Awda Qawwas:


    Khadija Benganna: What is the state's position?

    'Awda Qawwas: What is the state's position? This is a very big question, and I will answer you on it. Their numbers are no more than 3,500 members throughout all of the regions of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, I think about 15,000 in the whole Arab world. What is the state's position? In the past the state went very easy on them, so as not to cause a political or religious uproar, or so as not to give the appearance of a lack of religious liberties. The state gave them permits either through the mediation of people of influence in certain governmental circles. We opposed these permits because they have a harmful effect on the ancient, local Eastern Churches to which we are proud to belong.


    Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

  • Buddhists, Philip Glass and Gandhi


    I get reams of magazines but I do try to make room for Tricycle, the glossy Buddhist review that does as well as any publication in explaining this religion to me. Only in 2002, when I made forays to Thailand and Japan, where I interviewed Buddhists or former Buddhists for a piece in our foreign section, did I realize the complexity of this world religion.


    Recently, the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life put out a massive survey of 35,000 people that gave as good an outline of any as to what shape the major religions have taken on American soil. Two-thirds of American Buddhists, it said, are first-generation converts; an impressive percentage.


    Other facts: Forty-five percent of the country's Buddhist live out West, followed by 23 percent in the South, 17 percent in the Northeast and 15 percent in the Midwest.


    The biggest age group is that of 30- to 49-year-olds, the same demographic advertisers crave. Just over half are male. Fifty-three percent are white and 32 percent are Asian; they are equally distributed among income and educational levels, 45 percent are married and 31 percent have never married. Seventy percent have no children. Hmmm. Sounds like this is a group that will be quite slow in reproducing itself for the next generation. 17_3homepage.jpg


    Back to Tricycle, its spring issue has an intriguing Q&A with minimalist composer Philip Glass, a convert from Judaism to Buddhism. Thirty years ago, he wrote a Sanskrit-language opera about Mahatma Gandhi, "Satyagraha," about the Gandhi's early years in South Africa. An updated version will be performed at New York's Metropolitan Opera House in April while Pope Benedict is in town. Maybe he can drop by?


    One of the most intriguing points in the story (found on the site) is how Gandhi, a Hindu, studied Christianity in London, where he found Jesus' teachings on compassion so compelling that he based his life on them. The New King James Version words a key verse (Matt: 25: 35-36) as follows: "For I was hungry and you gave me food; I was thirsty and you gave me drink. I was a stranger and you took me in. I was naked and you clothed me. I was sick and you visited me. I was in prison and you came to me."

    Photo courtesy of Tricycle magazine


    "I think there is something very much at the heart of Gandhi in those words," Glass said near the end of the Tricycle interview. "And of course it's Christian. And that may make it a hard pill for us Buddhists to swallow."


    He added, "I think that basically the Buddhist community is a weak community. And it's weak because it's guided by self-interests." I was not sure, by the end of the piece, whether he held out much hope for Buddhism's ability to change hearts, much less national destinies.


    Is there something vital missing in Buddhism that it took a Hindu acting along Christian principles to liberate India from the British? (Remember, one does not have to believe in God to be Buddhist). Does its inwardness have anything to do with such a high percentage of American Buddhists remaining childless? Folks such as Philip Glass are asking really interesting questions.


    Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

    A legacy for the president: Iraqi Christians


    Here's something for President Bush to accomplish that will be a true legacy: Instruct the U.S. military and State Department to do what it takes to prevent the extinction of Iraq's Christians.


    Only Pope Benedict XVI is offering much in the way of meaningful protest against the way Assyrian and Chaldean Christians, not to mention other non-Muslim groups that are also being run out of the country or killed. Although much the same thing is happening all over the Middle East, Iraq has one of the world's oldest surviving Christian communities. In one week of January, nine Christian churches in Baghdad, Kirkuk and Mosul were bombed and several people injured. The Iraqi government does little or nothing to prevent such attacks.


    John Eibner, the CEO of Christian Solidarity International and Pascale Warda, a Baghdad resident who's the former Iraqi minister of migration and displacement, recently visited my office to try to publicize this ongoing ethnic cleansing. They arrived soon after I got a phone call from Elizabeth Valgiusti, an Italian filmmaker who recently showed her film, "Iraq's Christians," on the Catholic University campus.


    I've enclosed a still here from the film, which describes the systemic destruction of 2,000 years worth of Iraqi Christian churches and monuments by Muslims. Tahira%20Church%20Mosul50.jpg


    A car bomb damaged this Chaldean church in west Mosul on Jan. 17, 2008. (Photo courtesy of Elizabeth Valgiusti)


    "While the United States is the occupying power in Iraq, it has enormous influence there and can do something," Eibner said. "I was just at the State Department and it's clear they know the facts. But the United States doesn't even want to acknowledge the problem as they fear reaction from the Arab world. It would confirm Muslim charges that the Americans are crusaders who are there on behalf of the Christians."


    Eibner, whose organization has begun a "Save Iraqi Christians" campaign, finds this attitude tremendously unfair.


    "President Bush said he wants to win the hearts and minds of Muslims; he's never said that about any other religion," he said.


    While the Americans dither, Christian homes and neighborhoods are taken over or destroyed and their occupants -- if they survive -- are forced into penury in Jordan or Syria. Some move to the Kurdish north of the country, but one must speak one of two Kurdish dialects to survive, and most Iraqi Christians know neither. Imagine, my two visitors said, having to move to Texas and get by only in Spanish. Or never knowing if your Sunday morning worship time will get delightfully interrupted by a car bomb.


    Those who move north are forced to join one of the two main Kurdish political parties there and produce a hard-to-get residency permit. And they are sunk if they are not part of a Kurdish clan, which helps its own members through well-established patronage systems. There are Christian villages north of Mosul (on the site of ancient Nineveh) but they do not have the space nor resources to take on thousands of refugees from Baghdad.


    I told them of my 2004 trip to that exact area, where I visited an Assyrian monastery and orphanage where everyone spoke Aramaic, the same language Jesus spoke. In my short time in the Kurdish cities of Erbil, Dohuk and Sulaymania, I saw how everything depends on who you know. I learned that many Kurds feel animosity towards Christians because Saddam Hussein favored them so while persecuting the Kurds. Now that the Kurds are in the ascendancy, they feel there was no one to help them during the years Saddam was using them for target practice and that the Christians can wait in line along with everyone else.


    Warda disagreed with my assessment, saying she was raised in Ainkawa, a Christian suburb of Erbil where she underwent hardships along with everyone else. What she wants is a safe haven for Christians on the Nineveh plain, due east of Mosul, with foreign help in making the fertile area habitable with electricity, water, phone lines and the other accoutrements of civilization. It's all farm or pastureland at the moment.


    "Roughly half of the Christian community in Iraq lives abroad now," Eibner said. "As of 2003, one million Christians lived in Iraq. Maybe 600,000 remain."


    Mesopotamia was once overwhelmingly Assyrian Christian with a sprinkling of Jews from the first through sixth centuries, they reminded me. The rise of Islam in the seventh century began putting a stop to that. Iraq's last Jews fled after World War II, leaving eight remaining Jews in Baghdad today.


    "And of the 600,000 Christians left," he said, "many aren't living in their own homes. They are internally displaced. Whole districts of Baghdad were depopulated of Christians" by Sunni or Shi'ite militias. It's as if all the Christians were driven out of Georgetown, old town Alexandria and Hyattsville.


    "There's no major program to bring Christians back home," he said. "What's needed is a Marshall Plan for Iraq. The USA must create conditions for the return of people to somewhere in Iraq that is secure. I believe politically it could be done in a plan to return all Iraqis with a provision for Christians and other non-Muslim minorities."


    "We have religions that don't exist elsewhere in the world," said Pacale Warda, in reference to the Yezidis (angel worshippers) and Mandaeans (followers of John the Baptist). The two have ranged the halls of Congress to try to get something done, but only Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback has spoken on the record about the dismal situation.


    Christians are still even in Basra, Warda informed me, even though news reports infer the city has gone totally Shi'ite. But there won't be any left in the country if the current carnage continues.


    In his last 10 months in office, President Bush has a strange sort of freedom in that he is no longer beholden to public or even world opinion. Why not use this time to shore up the persecuted in Iraq? And if anyone complains, why should he care?


    Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

    Green... Bibles?


    I get tons of press releases every day, but this one really irked me. Thomas Nelson, a mega-publisher of Bibles and all things Christian, announces a new "eco-friendly" edition of the Holy Book and a company-wide switch to "environmentally conscious Bible bindings and practices."


    You can take a look at it here.


    The Nashville-based publisher is addressing the "environmental needs" of its customers, it announce by switching from synthetic covers to "bonded leather, leather and hardcover formats" and "green" binding material. Sounds to me like high-grade paper and leather.


    "In moving away from oil-based covers we're not only honoring our customers' needs, but we're also honoring our Godly calling to be good stewards of the things He has given to us," says Wayne Hastings, the group's senior vice president. The phase-out of polyurethane/oil-based covers should be complete within five years.


    The publisher actually has an environmental policy that informs us that "part of God's message is to be respectful of the planet and all the resources in our care."


    Other than a few verses in Genesis, where does it say that in the Bible? Nowhere. So to say that 21st-century enviro-speak is "part of God's message" is a bit of a stretch.


    Plus, I didn't know my trusty bedside Bible had "environmental needs." And about that leather: Doesn't that mean the death of a horse or cow in there somewhere? How environmentally friendly is that?


    Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

    Which churches are the country's largest?


    It's always intriguing to see which churches have grown and which denominations have faded in the past year. According to the 2008 Yearbook of American and Canadian Churches (a Bible of sorts for us religion writers), the fastest-growing religious body in 2007 was the Jehovah's Witnesses at 2.25 percent.


    Following them were the Mormons at 1.56 percent and the Roman Catholics at .87 percent. Compare this to last year's states that had the Catholics out front at 1.94 percent, followed by the Assemblies of God at 1.86 and the Mormons at 1.63.


    The denomination with the biggest decrease is the Episcopalians at 4.15 percent.
    There are all sorts of arguments why some of these figures on the list below are bogus. For instance, several of the historic black churches with the "no increase or decrease listed" after their name do not release statistics at all. So the membership figure after their name is a guess at best. Plus churches' standards for membership are different. Baptist groups tend to count only those who have made an adult profession of faith. More liturgical churches include any child that has been baptized.


    Still, the majority of church groups on this list are not growing. Of the top three churches [Roman Catholics, Southern Baptists and United Methodists], the Methodists are losing members.


    There are some surprises here. The Lutheran Church/Missouri Synod decreased by .94 percent. I thought all conservative churches were growing. Ditto for the two Orthodox bodies listed here that are also losing members.


    And there are more members of the Assemblies of God than Episcopalians. Guess which of the two gets more news coverage.


    Here are the top 25:


    1. The Roman Catholic Church, 67,515,016 members, an increase of .87 percent.
    2. Southern Baptist Convention, 16,306,246 members, an increase of .22 percent.
    3. The United Methodist Church, 7,995,456 members, a decrease of .99 percent.
    4. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 5,779,316 members, an increase of 1.56 percent.
    5. The Church of God in Christ, 5,499,875 members, no increase or decrease reported.
    6. National Baptist Convention, U.S.A., Inc., 5,000,000 members, no increase or decrease reported.
    7. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, 4,774,203 members, a decrease of 1.58 percent.
    8. National Baptist Convention of America, Inc., 3,500,000 members, no increase or decrease reported.
    9. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), 3,025,740 members, a decrease of 2.36 percent.
    10. Assemblies of God, 2,836,174 members, an increase of .19 percent.
    11. African Methodist Episcopal Church, 2,500,000 members, no increase or decrease reported.
    11. National Missionary Baptist Convention of America, 2,500,000 members, no increase or decrease reported.
    11. Progressive National Baptist Convention, Inc., 2,500,000 members, no increase or decrease reported.
    14. The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod (LCMS), 2,417,997 members, a decrease of .94 percent.
    15. Episcopal Church, 2,154,572 members, a decrease of 4.15 percent.
    16. Churches of Christ, 1,639,495 members, no increase or decrease reported.
    17. Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, 1,500,000 members, no increase or decrease reported.
    17. Pentecostal Assemblies of the World, Inc., 1,500,000 members, no increase or decrease reported.
    19. The African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church, 1,443,405 members, an increase of .21 percent.
    20. American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., 1,371,278 members, a decrease of 1.82 percent.
    21. United Church of Christ, 1,218,541 members, a decrease of 0.47 percent.
    22. Baptist Bible Fellowship International, 1,200,000, no increase or decrease reported.
    23. Christian Churches and Churches of Christ, 1,071,616 members, no increase or decrease reported.
    24. The Orthodox Church in America, 1,064,000, no increase or decrease reported.
    25. Jehovah's Witnesses, 1,069,530 members, an increase of 2.25 percent.


    Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

    John Roberts vs. the Conservative Rabbis


    When is an award not an award?


    When a conservative Catholic Supreme Court justice meets up with bunch of Conservative rabbis, that's when.


    According to the original press release for Religion and the Public Square, a Feb. 10-14 meeting of some 400 rabbis representing the leadership of the nation's Conservative movement, Chief Justice John Roberts was slated to receive an award tonight.


    Called the Truth and Justice Award, it was to have been presented by the Rabbinical Assembly in the Presidential Ballroom of the Capitol Hilton downtown. That was as of mid-January. No sooner had the announcement been made, than folks began to murmur. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency captured well the ambivalence some folks felt about giving the justice an award when so many of them disagree with him several things, such as abortion. jwohlberg.jpg


    I was told by people connected with the conference that rumbling was going on but that the award was going not so much to the man as to his office.


    "He is the highest official of the highest court in the land and he represents to the American community the various principles that are basic to our religious tradition, such as justice and concern for the poor," said Rabbi Jeffrey Wohlberg of Adas Israel Congregation in the District. "We are not awarding an individual, we are awarding the chief justice of the Supreme Court of the United States."

    Rabbi Jeffrey Wohlberg. (Photo courtesy of Adas Israel)


    Well, that was then.


    Midway through the conference, which ends Thursday, I got another e-mail from one of the folks handling PR for the gathering. The award had been downgraded to a book.


    "The situation is that we will be handing John Roberts a Tanach … the Hebrew Bible (5 books of Moses, Prophets and the various other holy writings), and that we are honoring him for his office, not endorsing or commenting in any way on his public record," it said. "We hope he will read thru the Tanach and be guided by its teachings."


    Not that I know Justice Roberts personally, but I am sure he already has some familiarity with Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.


    I talked with Rabbi Susan Grossman of Beth Shalom Congregation, who drafted the Rabbinical Assembly's 2007 resolution on reproductive freedom and health care, which says Judaism believes that personhood and human rights begin at birth, not conception. Roman Catholics believe life begins at conception. Major difference there.


    "We are thrilled that Supreme Court justice wants to come speak to us even though we are pro-choice and for women's rights," she said from the Capitol building where she was lobbying for the passing of the Freedom of Choice Act. "We're not pro-abortion, but we believe there is not a place for the government to interfere where there is not unanimity in the public square."


    Well, chances are that Justice Roberts will be none the wiser for receiving the award-that-was-not-an-award.


    One more note from Wohlberg, 66, the incoming president of the Rabbinical Assembly. He told me he'd like to ramp up the numbers of Conservative American Jews, currently at about 1 million.


    Whereas the Orthodox branch of American Judaism has seen a resurgence, as have Reformed Jews, "There is this popular perception that implies that Conservative Judaism has changed dramatically," he said. I assume he meant changed for the worse.


    "But," he insisted, "we are the strong middle."


    Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

    The martyred nun


    Tuesday was the second anniversary of the death of Sister Dorothy Stang, who at the age of 73 was gunned down in the rural Amazon by two gunmen. GreatestGift30%25.jpg


    According to her just-released biography, "The Greatest Gift," by Binka Le Breton, it was the rich landowners and various government officials who did her in, as they were sick of her ceaseless activity on behalf of the poor farmers who lived along the Transamazon Highway in Brazil.


    The Amazon rainforest is one amazing piece of real estate containing one-fifth of all the Earth's fresh water and billions of dollars worth of minerals under its red soil. It constitutes a billion acres spread out over several nations. More than 20 percent of the world's oxygen is produced there. The rainforest is being cut away at the rate of 1 1/2 acres every second, thanks to the short-sighted Brazilian government, multinational logging companies and rapacious landowners.


    There were plenty landless peasants trying to live off this land, and Sister Dorothy was committed to protect them.


    She would still be living in obscurity had two thugs, paid off by rich landlords, killed her early on the morning of Feb. 12, 2005. According to the book, she was reading outloud to her murderers from the Beatitudes when she was gunned down. Although the hired gunmen were brought to trial and sentenced to many years in prison, those who masterminded her murder were never brought to justice.


    So light a candle in the hope that Sister Dorothy did not die in vain.


    Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

    Picking on the wrong Muslims


    Here is a note to the folks out in Hagerstown who voted last week to bar a Muslim group from building a mosque and retreat center out there in Frederick County. First read this to come to speed on this issue.


    The Ahmadiyya Muslims who want to build this facility aren't al Qaeda by a long shot. Not only have they been denounced as not being true Muslims, they've been continually persecuted, especially in Pakistani Punjab. And what for? Its 19th century founder, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, said he was the Islamic "mahdi" (messiah), making him greater than Muhammad, the founder of Islam. This has not gone over well in mainstream Islam. In 1984, the Pakistani government, under General Zia-ul-Haq, banned proselytizing by Ahmadis and also banned calling Ahmadis as Muslims.


    According to this ordinance, any Ahmadi who refers to oneself as a Muslim by words, either spoken or written, or by visible representation, directly or indirectly, or makes the call for prayer as other Muslims do, is punishable by imprisonment of up to 3 years.


    They also believe that Jesus survived the crucifixion and travelled towards India to search for the lost tribes of Israel. Furthermore, they claim that his tomb, containing his body, has been recently discovered in Kashmir.


    Agree or disagree with this group (their web site is here if you want to know more), they have never been connected with violence.

    Mirza%20Ghulam%20Ahmad.jpg

    courtesy of www.alislam.com

    I just happened upon Pickled Politics, a blog that compared Ahmadiyya Muslims to Mormons in that they both believe in continuing revelation. Both were founded in the 19th century by men (Joseph Smith, Mirza Ahmad) who claimed to be reformers calling both religions (Christianity, Islam) back to their original pure states. Neither have been accepted by these religions as bonified.


    Considering how the Admadiyyas have been hounded non-stop for claiming to be Muslim, chances are they simply wanted a piece of Maryland countryside they could call their own and be left in peace. The zoning appeals board there needs to get a better grip on the differences between violent and non-violent Muslims. The town's claim that it could not sustain an annual Ahmadiyya camp-out of 5,000 to 10,000 people there is bogus. Small towns host Christian music festivals all the time that attract similar crowds. I don't hear them complaining about being overwhelmed.


    Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

    The last prayer breakfast


    "At this final prayer breakfast as your president, I thank you for your prayers," President Bush said this morning.


    He was speaking to some 4,000 people crammed into the Washington Hilton ballroom, most of whom had shelled out $175 a piece for repast of granola, fresh fruit, coffee and Danish. The full text of his speech, which was quite theologically sound, is at www.whitehouse.gov. I'd include a photo of the event but none of us were allowed to bring in cameras.


    The National Prayer Breakfast, by the way, is a three-day event crammed with seminars and tours for guests from around the country. The expensive ticket prices for the breakfast subsidize a host of international visitors — plus some heads of state — who are flown here for what's essentially low-key intros to Christianity. A lot of other meetings happen here; this is the event that provided a forum for Jordan's King Abdullah to have closed-door meetings with American evangelicals in 2006.


    I've been twice before to these breakfasts but as a member of the White House press pool. This time, I went as an ordinary person — my employer did not pay for my ticket — just to see what it's like to be in the peanut gallery.


    To my right was a woman who was running an NGO from North Dakota that ministers to poor Guatemalan children. To my left was the director of a local crisis pregnancy center and a builder from Kirkland, Wash. The speakers were also mixed bag. The keynote, Ward Brehm of the Africa Development Fund, joked that his audience had never heard of him, then went on to give an entertaining talk about his transition from hard-boiled businessman to advocate for Africa's poor.


    Colorado Sen. Ken Salazar, a Democrat and a Roman Catholic, emceed much of the gathering. After he praised Sen. Dianne Feinstein as a roll model for the Senate, she followed up with what was supposed to be a reading from Scripture. Instead it was a New Agey-sounding essay written by a Reform rabbi.


    The best quote of the gathering came from Judge Carlos Lucero, who serves on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. "Poor New Mexico," he mused. "So far from heaven. So close to Texas."


    The better show was actually the night before at columnist Cal Thomas' annual media dinner. Mickey Rooney, 88, brought down the house with a no-holds-barred Christian message and a short film with clips about his famous life. He was there with his eighth wife, Jan Chamberlin, with whom he has stayed married for 30 years.


    rooney.jpg

    Mickey Rooney and wife Jan (www.mickeyrooney.com)


    Actress Patricia Heaton's monologue was by far the funniest of the evening but I was most struck by a short speech by Jim Pinkerton, one-time political analyst for Fox News Channel and Newsday columnist.


    I hadn't known he had decided to forsake it all and become a senior advisor to the Huckabee campaign. Talk about selling all you have and giving to the poor.
    Had he done it for the money, I asked him afterwards.


    "Oh, no," he said, "I'm still a volunteer."

    Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

    Red, white & blue religion books


    Now that we're all taking a breather from Super Tuesday, I wanted to mention I have four new books on my desk on a general theme that goes like this: The religious right is in the trash heap of history and the real energy and all the good ideas are coming from the religious left. Three of these books all have red, white and blue covers. Hmmmm. tonycampolo.jpg


    There's Tony Campolo's "Red Letter Christians: A Citizen's Guide to Faith & Politics," with an attractive design showing a church in blue hues on an American flag background. "Red Letter Christians," a concept introduced at the National Press Club more than a year ago, refers to those who say their main guide is Jesus' own words — outlined in red in some editions of the Bible.


    The church, say the RLC'ers, has lost its focus on Christ's direct commands and teachings. Atop this book is an endorsement from Bill Clinton; not a surprise in that Campolo was one of three ministerial counselors called in when Clinton was in his moral and ethical free-fall 10 years ago. Remember those days?


    Not to be outdone is Jim Wallis' "The Great Awakening: Reviving Faith & Politics in a Post-Religious Right America." He has an endorsement from Jimmy Carter atop his front cover. I've been following Wallis since before 1976 when, as a college student, I interviewed him for The Washington Star. He had just relocated his evangelical activist group from Chicago to the District and had founded a community of Christian households, at the time a radical innovation. Sojourners, which is what Wallis renamed his group, has been a staple of the evangelical left since then in the District but only came into its own about four years ago when Democrats discovered that religious faith was important in national politics. jimwallisgreatawakening10%25.jpg


    After Sen. John Kerry's defeat, Wallis, who was immensely sympathetic to Democratic ideals, was brought in to advise them on how to make them less tone-deaf to religion. A quick skim reveals the book is pretty much an update of an earlier book, "God's Politics."


    Then there's Joel Hunter's "A New Kind of Conservative," again with a white background with red and blue figurines on the cover. This is more a teaching book, as Hunter is a pastor. The subject is, again, faith and politics. My goodness, we're still in primary season and I'm already weary of this topic. The theme of this book — and to some extent the two others — is that there's a "new" kind of evangelical Christian out there who wants to move beyond abortion and homosexuality issues to the environment, AIDS, poverty and justice. The era of the Christian Coalition is long gone, there's a new wave coming and so on.


    Maybe I am just out of touch, but the kind of folks I bump into at church and other religious gatherings aren't spending a lot of time worrying about any of these topics. I can't say I spend a lot of time discussing the immorality of U.S. policy on torture with anyone I know, mainly because none of my friends or neighbors really care about the matter. Or the war in Iraq, for that matter. Of course they should, but they don't. joelhunter.jpg


    The only people I see protesting in front of the local abortion clinic is a handful from a nearby Catholic parish, although I will say several friends of mine take part in the annual March for Life on Jan. 22. But that's it.


    So, who is reading these red, white and blue books? Kids on college campuses?
    It turns out the most interesting book in the pile has a blue and black color scheme: Amy Sullivan's "The Faithful Party: How and Why Democrats are Closing the God Gap." She's got the juicy behind-the-scenes gossip on how the Dems have made every mistake in the book as to appealing to people of faith plus she's the best writer of the four. And what's on her cover?


    A donkey.



    Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

    Sex, immigration and Shrinemont


    virginia_house_inset2.jpg


    OK, so we're a little late in filing some observations on last week's council meeting of the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia.


    After two days of attending the annual event the Reston Hyatt, I want to list three things Virginia Episcopalians care about the most. How can I tell? Easy: The lengthiest debates were on matters of sex, immigration and Shrinemont.


    First off, it was plain the diocese is re-branding itself after suffering the loss of more than 5,000 members a year ago when 11 of its churches pulled out, saying the Virginia diocese was too liberal on theological and moral issues. Just before the council meeting, Virginia Bishop Peter Lee posted an open letter on the diocesan web site, www.thediocese.net, calling the diocese "orthodox and open." Signs posted at the entrance to the council meeting proclaimed, "Virginia: Church of the Future" and "A Story Waiting to be Written."


    The emphasis was very much on how the diocese is moving on to better things with just a teensy bit of a slam against those who've jumped ship.


    "As I listen around the church, the one consistent theme that I hear is that clergy want to be in the Diocese of Virginia," Suffragan Bishop David Jones said near the end of the council. "I find it very disconcerting to read disparaging comments about us from our former members. Labels have been applied to us that have no connection with reality. To say that we have abandoned Scripture is blatantly not true. I am proud that we have not responded in kind."


    Two delegates sidled up to the press table at one point and began talking with a blogger from Episcopal Cafe, operated by the Diocese of Washington.


    "There's so much better atmosphere here this year," one remarked.


    "Well, that's because the element that was causing trouble was removed," said the other.


    Now to the aforementioned items: for as long as I've been covering these diocesan meetings (since 2004), there's always been some resolution on the hot topics of Episcopaldom: same-sex unions or ordination of openly gay clergy. This year it was "inclusiveness in ordained ministry;" a resolution that got vastly watered down to say Virginia Episcopalians would only give the matter "discernment and reflection." Which goes to say Virginia is vastly different than the Diocese of Washington across the Potomac River. Washington, which at last count has at least 14 gay couples on its clergy roster. Washington also announced in its diocesan newspaper that it's developing a strategy "for the full inclusion of gay and lesbian Christians in the life of the Church."


    About immigration: Lots of passionate rhetoric on this one. Northern Virginia has been quite the center for a national debate on whether local governments should pay for places where (mostly) illegal immigrants can keep warm and dry while looking for jobs or waiting for work.


    But the biggest blow up was on a proposed cut of $6,970 in scholarships to Shrinemont, the diocese's lovely retreat in Orkney Springs in the foothills of the Blue Ridge mountains. Now Shrinemont really is a nice place, filled with gardens and places for children to play. A historic, four-story hotel filled with balconies and porches and rocking chairs dominates the place. A parish or youth retreat here is a big deal.


    So, delegate after delegate came to the microphone with sad stories about how young people depend on this money to get to this camp, how young lives could be ruined without it and so on. Finally, one enterprising woman suggested that if 69 people contributed $100 each on the spot, the deficit could be resolved.


    Everyone dug into their pockets and purses and came up with $19,700. When someone suggested from the stage that the extra funds might go toward other areas in the cash-strapped diocese, a big "NO" welled up from the crowd.


    In the Virginia diocese, you can say what you want about theology, sex, immigration or the local bishops. But don't mess with Shrinemont.


    Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

    The Washington Times Advertising Links


     


    The Washington             Times - Brighter. Bolder. Privacy Policy | About TWT | Community Relations | Site Map | Contact Us
    Advertise | Subscription Services

    All site contents copyright © 2008 The Washington Times, LLC.

    home news opinion sections classifieds affiliates